Professor Phyllis Pricilla Parer

Hi my name is Professor Phyllis Pricilla Parker. Some of the facilities here call me Professor PP and I really resent it. They don't call Professor Stephan Herbert Ingram Thompson by his initials.

I am working on a medical dissertation on the male species that I and my colleague Professor Danielle Debra Dewater hope to publish in the local medical journal. Our study deals with the male genital, sub set the penis, subsub set uncircumcised, subsubsub set flaccid. Professor Danielle Debra Dewater is inspecting the subsubnsub set circumcised.

As you can suspect needing the subject to be flaccid can create some problems. The biggest problem is unwanted erections which create difficulties with the study. To solve this we have hired graduate students as assistances to insure the penis is flaccid during our examinations. Basically they, the assistance, bring the subject to a state of erection and then perform the steps necessary to cause an orgasm. Then we can complete the examinations without interruptions. Due to state laws the act of sexual intercourse is deemed unlawful between unmarried individuals.

So, to prevent that no breech of our public morals takes place we insist the all of the steps necessary to insure the penis is flaccid for my portion of the study is done by masturbation. Fellatio if the erection does not respond quickly to the manual method in a timely manner. Let me promise you that only these two processes are being used. I have personally observed these functions, merely to insure that proper steps are taken to prevent any misunderstandings take place.

You would think that if intercourse between the unmarried was being outlawed that the other choices would be also. I happened to look into that strange omission and it appears that the senate of our state was reluctant to discuss these particular acts. Suggestions were made that because several important members of the senate had certain friends that may have enjoyed these hobbies it was never discussed in committee.

Sorry, I digress. I was explaining some of the processes we undertake to insure that all the steps we are taken to have unexpected conditions upset our study.

Normally Professor Danielle Debra Dewater conducts the training of new assistants to insure that they understand and are able to conduct the prior treatment before her or I do our part of the study. I have in a pinch done the training but prefer not to because I tend to get too involved and do not let the new assistant get any practical practice.

Sometimes the new assistants are well practiced in the arts needed to perform their job. But we still oversee their first several study objects. One new young assistant, for example, explained that she did not need any instructions on the second process to reduce an erection. She explained that a previous boyfriend had explained the operation in great detail and allowed her to practice a number of times. We still insisted that she allow us to observe her technique. She was very skilled, no training was necessary and we welcomed her to the group.

Now if I may, let me procced to my portion of this ground breaking study. It may appear to be a simple process but let me be perfectly clear. Every step is carefully completed before any conclusions are made. Measurements are taken such as length and diameter and in my case the foreskin condition. Such as does it completely cover the meatus or is it too short to do that. We even measure the external urethral orifice on the end of the penis. You might be surprised to find that this opening can and does vary in size. Skin conditions are examined in very closely. In some cases a magnify glass may be used for real close up inspections. Photos are taken to document that certain steps are taken properly. Unfortunately I am not able to display these photographs due to privacy laws. The final step is to make detailed notes.

Because all the data is entered into a data base and the information is very detailed it takes a long time to complete the input and to keep our findings fresh in our minds even though we make notes we have found it best to complete the total process before seeing the next subject.

This can in rare cases caused slight back log of subjects. Please allow me to explain. Yesterday my first examination was due to start at eight-thirty in the morning. Because of the pretreatment required for each man he is normally checked in at eight am. This particular person had an extraordinary problem with achieving the necessary state of arousal and then an even longer time to ejaculate. As a result I had to call in a second assistant to assist the first.

When the results were finally obtained I was already ten minutes behind on my schedule. To compound the problem he had several unique traits that I had to notate in the data. When I was finally done with my first subject I was already over the normal time allowed for each examination.

Because of this delay number two had an extraordinary longer wait. Being in the nude state in front of this young lady he developed another erection. As a result a second treatment was required to return him to the flaccid condition. His intake person complained that she had to repeat the process and threatened to quit and I had to sooth the troubled waters. All this caused a further delay.

By now our third study person was kept waiting longer than promised and he was upset and couldn't raise the required erection despite the all efforts made. He left and now we had to wait for number four to arrive. It ended up that instead of the normal six studies done that day only five were completed.

To compound the day's results I still had to pay my assistant that day for the normal work load because of number two needing two treatments. Ah...the things we do for science. It's a good thing I enjoy my work and I truly believe that the findings that Professor Danielle Debra Dewater and I will come up with will contribute to a better understanding of the male penis.

At the end of our study we will compile all the data we have collected and study it in great detail, put it into an understandable format and then finally we will share the findings with the entire medical community.

I hope that after my explanations of what we are doing and hope to accomplish that all this talk about a bunch of perverted ladies will cease and we can continue our work in silence. So I thank you for allowing me to share my work with you and hope you have gained some perspective of the difficult work your local scientist might be doing in your behave.

I suspect that one or two of you may be curious about one or more things our study has found out. I can share one fun fact. The shortest penis I have measured was just barely over two inches in length. Professor Danielle Debra Dewater has informed me that she had one that was less than two inches in length. She says that it barely poked out of the pubic hair. When asked the assistant that conducted the intake process stated that this penis did reach out to over six inches when erect. While we do not allow the assistants to do any measurements their experience does give them a great deal of experience so I tend to believe it when they give us this extra information. This also confirms the fact that what are commonly called growers can achieve normal size when in the erect condition.

Professor Phyllis Pricilla Parker

As always I appreciate your comments on my little stories and I thank you for reading it. I was thinking this tale would have been enhanced with a little art but unfortunately I have no ability in this field.