I have noticed the 'idealistic trend' of making women a passive aggressive, instead of recognizing them for their "power that radiates from within them" that truly appears to be the most frequent reason for them opening up to a male in need. We have too much bias for a horny lady permitting an aroused male the right to give them a good fucking, instead of - yielding to the maiden's equal member status for seeking sexual relief! Then to scorn sexual participants with morality codes of a sick society's attitude regarding unrealistic limitations on an adult's sexual needs, is stupidity to me! Mother kissing daughter while her (adult) son is emptying himself into his (adult) sister's cunt is acceptable to me – as long as they are all comfortable and contented afterward. In fact mama and daughter can switch places, as long as brother is still capable!
Porn doesn't have to be "nasty", and can instead be an explicit method to illustrate the affection between humans, regardless of orientation. Close friends enjoying an orgy, or a dedicated couple inviting another into their bed is truly normality, and is something that frequently occurs – but the secret is kept, and it used as life's enhancement rather than a stored tool to control someone. This is reality rather than idealistic bullshit that is popularly spread!
Now I am not saying that my view is the only view, but instead I am hoping to solicit more excitement for me by reading about fearless but affectionate fucking, from the innovative writers out there - without any weak couplings. I truly enjoy where the intensity of the rut is mutual, normal, and beautiful! Sex is a loving sleeping pill at night, with couples excitingly neutering each other to comfortably enjoy their bodies recharge, after the day's distentions. Solving curiosities, reducing barriers, and raising ego's confidence levels through successful seduction - along with sexual relief are the more natural reasons to copulate. Hero worship, career fucking, marrying just for sex or for status, is all classified as competitive sex, and I would prefer not to embellish this forte', unless I want to put a novel twist into it – like the nasty lady that marries the wealthy actor, while enjoying an ongoing sexual relationship with his gardener, only to realize she really loves her husband, and then applies her practiced skills accordingly (for both)!
Yes, there is a place for getting nasty, and that is interesting reading also; however, the school teacher or professor that shares genitals with students for the purpose of exposing them to life's normality (while getting off themselves) should not be censored more than daddy fucking daughter. Double penetration is almost a comedy of a woman 'forcing' two guys to enjoy her, and is quite theatrical, though overkill as a stunt, instead of the delicious serial intimacy, like a party girl 'sniper' taking each 'target', one at a time into secluded intimacy for a chain of thrills. This is just my point of view!
I write with honesty, and try to identify normal human lust without any judgment, meaning I will enter into contract openly, without prejudice. I love my wife, and we are mated for life – even though she is free to go at any time. If she were totally free from societies bondage, and had boyfriends that would fuck her occasionally, I would proud and happy for her enjoying personal freedom. I would also feel affection for the males that gave the one I love so much pleasure. And if the day ever comes when she can present me with a cream pie, she will find me lustfully adding a bit more cream into the mixture, while making emotional love to her at the same time. When I portray this attitude in my writing, many think of me as a wimp instead of a realist. To me nature dictates over the transgressions of mankind who creates illogical rules, which frequently abridge normality creating unrealistic legal structure that is totally unneeded.
Incest obviously is a tool for evolution, since it was performed for ages prior civilization without any thought of protection. Unfortunately modern society, with a zero tolerance attitude, tends to eliminate affection from sexual activities while coldly promoting contracts (shallow marriages i.e. mistress and or gigolo of the week, rent a wife, rent a slave, etc.). "We only did it (fucking) because we were both aroused," and any thought of enjoying the activity while intensely comforting a loved one seems to be on the back burner, just showing up occasionally from the writers that make their donations from the general public. This attitude is promoted by frustration that always seems to amplify jealousy – something the aging process tends to subdue.
The physical act of intercourse is something boys and girls do because they have the tools, and the programming that make it an absolutely necessity, biologically. Cumming into a pussy carries the tranquilizers a girl needs, and the shear pleasure and relief the male experiences after discharge into an eager receptacle is also lowering his testosterone; totally demonstrating the normal comforting and necessity of this beautiful act of sharing life's gifts. Porn stars have it right with proper attitudes toward the sex act itself as simple demonstrations of human lust, and they display it accordingly without complications (even though they are somewhat financially motivated). The multitude of 18 to 25 year old freelance hookers that our economy supports, tend to enjoy plying the art of seduction, the excitement of the rut, disobedience and defiance more than the financial rewards – while believing they are just having fun while getting paid for it.
