WESTRONS Part 1
This is a bit of a departure for me. It will probably end up being considerably longer than my other stories (which are already plenty long). The title won't make sense until Part 3.
Thanks to my editors/proofreaders for the first two chapters: Kaereni, Evan Mauk, Desperadosies and Alianath Iriad. They gave me good advice (some of which I took). Any errors left over are mine.
***
I tried to fit in.
Really, I did. I went out on pub crawls with the other cadets. I bought rounds, even though I could ill afford to. I went so far as to hold Stedemann's head while he puked on his shoes, so that he wouldn't spew all over his trousers.
Then I stood guard while Mikel banged some nubile in an alley.
- "You want some o' that, Cook?" he asked, as he zipped up.
- "No, thanks."
- "Suit yerself."
Another night, I met a pretty girl who seemed interesting, and interested. But when she discovered that I had nowhere to take her, she quickly found another cadet more to her liking.
My classmates were, for the most part, juvenile. Mindless guzzling machines. I shouldn't criticize, I suppose; I didn't know where these guys had grown up, or what kind of environments they came from.
Didn't really care, either.
The female cadets were on Rymmel 3 - a mere 200 light years away. They kept us segregated, because apparently males can't 'concentrate on their studies' when females are present. Dead-set against 'intergender fraternization': that's today's AF (Armed Forces).
Of course, some of the cadets had money. The well-off could rent a little apartment near the Market District, and set up a mistress there. From what I heard, you could get a part-time girlfriend for 15,000 marks a month; an upscale, full-time mistress could run you between 60 and 70,000.
I was on a scholarship: 6,000 a month. Room, meals and 'incidentals' were
deducted
from that. End result: about 600 a month in pocket change.
Most of the guys went out on large group 'tears', or 'hoot n' hollers'. Loads to drink, in the cheaper bars, after which they'd hit a series of nightclubs, trying to impress one of the barflies or the nubiles (halfway to groupies) who swarmed the Market at night.
If a cadet was lucky, or clever, he might catch one of these girls already 3/4 drunk. Or, if he wasn't too picky ... there were other options.
Not my scene.
I started to gravitate towards some of the more serious students. These guys liked to discuss our required readings, or analyze our exercises - the TacSims (tactical simulations) in particular.
Kindred souls, in a way. I got into a decent study group for a while. Eventually, though, even these guys started finding reasons to avoid me.
For one thing, I had a tendency to ask uncomfortable questions in class - I mean, uncomfortable for our instructors. Within a short time, all of the Profs knew who I was. I was definitely
not
the teacher's pet. Couldn't blame the other cadets for not wanting to sit too close to me, in case I was contagious.
But I think the smarter guys were also beginning to sense that there was something seriously wrong with me.
See - I didn't
buy
the shit they were teaching us.
***
At University, I couldn't decide between Military History and Psychology. One of my professors gave me a recommendation for AFOTA (Armed Forces Officer Training Academy). Two interviews, the psych test, 3 exams and 2 physicals ... and I was in. Scholarship, too.
Half of the cadets at the Officer Factory were rich kids. Connected, and loaded. Another third were legacies (nepotism still rules, even in the 26th century).
The final sixth were on scholarship, like me.
The curriculum was okay: Hamilcar Barca, Robert E. Lee, Napoleon, Daykera ... all lessons on how to win with less. Then Vietnam, the Roman Empire, the Potilo Cluster ... or how to win against popular movements when you have overwhelming force.
We had regular classes in Psych, Leadership, Logistics, Strategy and Tactics ...
But there was no outright mention of the single most important element of modern warfare: asymmetrical hostilities.
Until Humanity runs into an equal or superior alien species who are hostile, our enemies can't face us in a total war. Obviously enough, they'll try to beat us with weapons they have, that we don't - or don't have enough of. Guerilla war. Cyber attacks. Infiltration and espionage (not as hard as you think, even in this day and age).
Humanity's resources are immense - but not unlimited. Local uprisings and revolts
do
have a chance to succeed, because our Supreme Command is so cheap. They routinely try to achieve maximum results with minimum expenditure.
Over-spend, or over-commit resources, and you could be cashiered. But under-spend, and lose an engagement, and you
will
be court-martialed.
We never discuss this in class. We have plenty of TacSims, but no strategic simulations.
I don't want to make it sound like I bitch about everything. There are some parts of our training that I actually agree with.
Despite Space Fleet, reflective body armor, and all of the advanced weaponry available to the AF, our instructors still believe in teaching us UC - Unarmed Combat.
We're exposed to multiple disciplines and styles, then encouraged to specialize in the one which best suits our physique, temperament, or inclination. The rationale for this freedom of choice is excellent: in a prolonged war, our opponents won't be able to prepare against a single-style of hand-to-hand combat.
The instructors tried to steer me towards karate, or another striking style; I like Barai better, because of the way it blends aikido and jiu-jitsu. No one else uses it - another point in its favor. I have to admit: I also like it because it pisses off the instructors.
We have tests and exams, which are just stupid, because they're entirely based on the material presented in class, or on our required readings. Virtually every single cadet uses Sleepread, which practically guarantees perfect recall. The others have eidetic memories (no, I'm not one of those).
There are no bonus marks for finishing early. You have all the time you could possibly need, and then some, to regurgitate everything (I know - as if that would happen in a real war). You can get a bonus for repeating a prof's off-the-cuff remarks, or for searching out and quoting one of their publications.
I'm not so good at ass-kissing.
But I did excel at the Survival Exercises. These are non-CATs (no computer-assisted technology, locators, range-finders ... you get the idea). We had to do orienteering - solo, and group. In one exercise, they gave us a compass. In another, a map.
Had I been in charge, I would have given us an inaccurate map - that would have made for an interesting exercise. But they did occasionally set us up with combat simulations where communications failed, or CATs were unavailable, because of unusual atmospheric conditions, radiation, enemy interference, or - my favourite - for no reason at all.
In those situations, I could show initiative. Originality. Unpredictability.
Here's an example of one of our TacSims: I was in command of 13 archers - yeah, bows and arrows. The intelligence briefing informed me that:
- my opponent had exactly the same number of identically-equipped archers
- the grid on which our sim took place was a level, featureless plain
- there were no atmospheric or climatic conditions which would affect missile trajectory
Minimalist in the extreme. But my opponent was the typical cadet; he would follow SOP (Standard Operating Procedure), as taught by our instructors. Advance scouts, and flank guards. Locate your opponent, and then concentrate your force.