Trigger Warning
Those who have lost relatives and friends in the Holocaust may find this upsetting.
The Story Continues.
Uri woke up bathed in sweat. He had a vague and unsettling recollection of having dreamed of being a time traveller. He had seen and chatted with Hitler in Vienna before WW1.
The History Behind Uri's Dream
During the Viennese period, Hitler was not someone who was up for in depth discussions. Hitler wanted to win arguments, especially of a political or artistic nature. Hitler wanted to be the resident expert. Initially he didn't want to win friends and influence people.
It was later in that period that he saw the importance of influencing people.
Hitler ranted at his opponents even in pre WW1 Vienna. Many non historians dismiss Hitler as a mad man. In Uri's opinion Hitler was sane, but evil. As far as Uri is aware Hitler never ever exhibited any symptoms of madness. Hitler could have been a successful artist or architect and been equally passionate in achieving his goals.
Uri knew that this chat with Hitler would have been impossible. Uri spoke only a limited amount of German. But, in the dream Hitler spoke, and sometimes shouted, in English. But Hitler otherwise behaved as Uri would expect Hitler to behave.
For instance, Hitler ate the fancy cakes that Vienna was famous for. When he became the German leader, Hitler was famous for loving cakes and having a sweet tooth. Nowadays he is seen as a vegetarian and, in some quarters, as a role model for alternative agriculture.
Hitler's Agriculture Plan And The "Half Earth" Proposal.
The genocidal SS General Plan East planned for 10 million racially-valuable Germanics (Germans, Dutch, Flemish, Scandinavians and English) to displace about 30 million Slavs and Balts.
The half earth theory asserts
(1) Humans are responsible for a biodiversity crisis;
(2) The rights of nature outweigh human wants;
(3) A half-Earth is an imperative.
"Nature Needs Half" argue that humans should withdraw from half of the entire Earth by 2050. The "International Union for Conservation of Nature" have backed the 2050 deadline.
Uri's Take On This
Uri feels the "half earth" model is purely Hitler's role for Russian agriculture writ in English. That contention is what his under-grad theses sought to prove. After all, the numbers affected by half earth make Hitler's 30 million look like a foothill. Added to this concerns about human population growth (estimated to go up to 10 billion).
As you might surmise, Uri is not popular with the eco warriors. What Uri couldn't put in his theses was that, if Hitler had been motivated by the "half earth" theory then over a billion people would be starved to death. The half earth proposal was potentially worse than Hitler's "General Plan East"
The formal Harvard Debating Club motion read "This house feels that radical measures are needed to reduce the dangers of climate change." Uri was the lead of the "Nay" team. As lead of the team he was able to expound his case against radical action, including half earth.
His opening line was "Hitler had a radical plan that would have had a major effect on climate change. The murder of 30 million Slavs and Balts. Today the twin calls of promoting a Green ecology and reducing population growth would give Hitler a chance to murder a billion people."
Uri took no prisoners. He accepted 2 interventions (which gained him 8 points) and analysed and answered them (he got 7 points) His responses were a tad long (he only got 5 points) and he tended to rely on one topic (4 points) though he had a good presentation manner (8 points).
Uri beat the next best by 3 points.
He won the Harvard Best Speaker prize. The next day the judges displayed all their criticisms. Their conclusion narrative read "Uri should have challenged briefly the contention that there is a need for radical action. However, as a first timer, this is an impressive performance."
Uri keeps a copy of the criticism, the photo of him and the trophy and the certificate (now neatly framed).