The next two days went like a dream for Anu.
She was having sex at will with Rohan, who was eager to please her. When he wasn't around, she immersed herself in reading--researching female-led relationships, polyamory, and poring over Ranjit's desperate emails. He was so turned on by his own acceptance of Rohan in their marriage, so willing to submit and surrender, and so ready to let Anu lead their marriage.
Rohan was going to be away that evening for work, and Ranjit had written that he'd be back over the weekend. Anu thought about finally replying to his email.
That evening, she sat alone on the balcony, phone in hand, her heart heavier than she cared to admit.
Ranjit's email was still open on the screen--warm, open, and unexpectedly vulnerable. He had agreed to a female-led relationship. He had even given her the space to be polyamorous--at least for a few months. But Anu knew this was uncharted territory for both of them.
She opened her browser and began typing:
"female led relationship psychology"
Articles popped up--some about empowerment, some about control, some about healing. She read stories of couples where the woman took the lead, not out of ego, but out of emotional strength, clarity, and care.
Could that be me? she wondered.
Her next search:
"polyamory in marriage India"
She found a mix of perspectives--Western voices, progressive Indian blogs, debates about culture and tradition. But most importantly, she found people speaking openly about love that didn't fit into a single mold.
I'm not alone, she thought.
Then she paused, and slowly typed:
"how to love your husband with erectile dysfunction"
The results were softer--gentler. Medical advice, emotional support forums, stories of women who stayed, adapted, and thrived. It wasn't just about sex. It was about intimacy, respect, and tenderness.
And finally:
"can a wife love two people?"
She read slowly. The answers were never black or white. But in the space between, Anu began to realize something important--love wasn't limited. But truth, boundaries, and intention were essential.
She closed her phone. Her tea had gone cold.
Anu wasn't looking for permission. She was looking for understanding--of herself, of Ranjit, and of the life they could still shape.
She picked up her phone again and opened a link titled:
"FAQs About the Cuckold Lifestyle"
Just reading the word cuckold made her wet.
One of the questions caught her eye:
Is polyamory advisable if your husband cannot satisfy you and you're attracted to other men?
The answer read:
Possibly, but only under certain conditions. Polyamory can be a healthy and ethical choice if:
Both partners consent freely without pressure.
There's emotional honesty, not secrecy or resentment.
Boundaries are clear, and jealousy is addressed openly.
You're both willing to do the emotional work--not just focus on the physical aspect.
If you're feeling deeply unfulfilled sexually, and your attraction to other men is growing, then suppressing those feelings indefinitely can lead to emotional distance or resentment. In that sense, ethical non-monogamy (including polyamory) may give you space to experience physical and emotional connection--without deception.
She scrolled to the next section:
What if your husband wants you to be satisfied sexually, to reduce his guilt?
This was a key emotional signal, Anu realized: Ranjit's suggestion wasn't just permission--it was selflessness, vulnerability, and perhaps even shame. Maybe he felt "less of a man" because of his erectile dysfunction. Encouraging her to find fulfillment elsewhere wasn't only acceptance--it was a painful gesture of love.
But here's what mattered:
Don't just take his permission at face value. Check in emotionally.
Is he really okay? Or is he sacrificing himself emotionally just to keep you happy?
If polyamory was pursued out of mutual love and clarity, it could deepen their bond.
If done from guilt or silence, it would slowly erode trust.
Yes, polyamory could work--but only if:
They talked openly and regularly.
His guilt was met with love, not just agreement.
She wasn't using polyamory to escape the relationship, but to expand it--with care.
Anu pushed her research aside, grabbed her vibrator, and slipped it inside her aching pussy. As it buzzed, her free hand opened her laptop. She knew she had to write a response--one rooted in what she'd just learned. She was stepping into something serious: Female-Led Relationships and Ethical Non-Monogamy. This wasn't a game. It was a path she needed to tread carefully--Ranjit would be back soon, and she didn't want to end up sulking, lonely, or trapped in a failing marriage with his tiny, unfulfilling cock inside her again.
Subject: Re: Landing Soon -- Wanted to Talk Before I'm Back
Hi Ranjit,
Thank you for writing with such honesty. It means more than I can say.
I've read your message a few times now, and I've sat with it. There's a quiet strength in your willingness to step into something new, even if it's uncomfortable or uncertain. That vulnerability--that openness--is something I still love deeply about you.
You mentioned being open to a female-led relationship, and I want to be clear with you about something: I'm not interested in playing with labels unless we both really understand what they mean to us. "Female-led" can take many shapes--some interpret it as soft emotional leadership, others as a more dominant, directive role that extends into intimacy, decision-making, and even power dynamics.
Before we step into this, I need to ask you honestly:
What does a female-led relationship mean to you, really? Are you imagining something symbolic, or something more structural and intimate?
Are you genuinely drawn to the idea of me taking more control--or are you offering this because you think it's what I want? There's a big difference, and I need us to be honest about which it is.
Do you see yourself as someone who might derive comfort or fulfillment from submission? Or does that idea make you uncomfortable?
Have you explored your own sexuality in depth--beyond the traditional roles we've always inhabited? If not, are you open to doing that now, for you--not just for us?
I don't ask these lightly. I ask them because I want whatever path we take--together or separately--to be rooted in truth. Not gestures. Not compromises that quietly breed resentment. And I ask them because I still care about you deeply, and I don't want to lose that care by pretending we're on the same page if we're not.
I know this isn't just about me and Rohan. That part of my life is real--yes--and filled with passion and power I hadn't known I craved. But that doesn't mean what you and I had--or might still have--should be discarded. It just needs to be reexamined with new eyes and deeper honesty.
I'd like to have this conversation in person when you're back. But I wanted to start opening the door here. If you need time to think about these questions, take it. I'd rather wait for a real answer than rush into something unclear.
Warmly,
Anu
Her fingers tightened around the vibrator as she sent the mail. She could feel her wetness, her orgasm building with every thought of riding Rohan's thick cock--so different from the limp frustration of her husband's.
She increased the vibration setting and let herself slip into trance, hips grinding against the seat.
And then she came--loud, shaking, her legs trembling as the climax rolled through her in waves. The orgasm wasn't just physical. It was emotional, powerful. She felt it in her pussy--and in her chest.
This was what she wanted. Not just pleasure, but authority. Control. Ownership of her life--and her desire.
She pulled the vibrator out slowly, her body still pulsing. Gasping softly, she opened her eyes and reached for her phone again.
What is Ethical Non-Monogamy (ENM)?
Ethical Non-Monogamy is a broad term for any relationship where partners consensually agree to engage with others--romantically, emotionally, or sexually--with honesty, transparency, and respect.
Forms of ENM include:
Polyamory: Romantic or emotional relationships with more than one person--with everyone's knowledge and consent.
Open Relationships: A couple stays emotionally committed but may have sex with others.
Swinging or Play-Based ENM: Focused on physical intimacy, often social.
Relationship Anarchy: Rejecting traditional hierarchy and roles entirely.
When Is ENM Advisable?