Husband drafted to be life model for art class, finds it's not that bad.
Sometimes, you know, life really does imitate art. Or is that vice-versa? Anyway, freshly early-retired with a move to a college town in the East, I convinced my shy wife, Sharon, that we shouldn't be passive, but should dive right into the local scene. Reluctant at first, she knew I had a point. She also dives and does about everything else much more gracefully and attractively than I. Pushing 50 coming up, she's younger by several years than I, and not only started off with a much better set of blonde and blue-eyed genes, but has worked hard to optimize them, now appearing both younger and more athletic at 5'5", with medium-sized 34B breasts that shouldn't look that good at her age, legs that shouldn't get so many admiring glances, and a face that I find lovely, and which doesn't include any abnormal characteristics, but that most folks frankly might find more ordinary than striking. It's also brilliantly animated when she smiles, which is rare in crowds but often once she's relaxed into a setting or with friends.
I work out to stay lean (I look and feel better on the slim side, I think), but have to work at it, trying to stay only a league or so beneath her in looks and energy. I'm hating having turned the half century mark last year and having now as well to admit to thinning hair. I stand 5' 10", 165 lbs, with similarly unstriking, and in my case likely pretty forgettable looks. I do keep my chest hair and groin close-trimmed since it gets a bit rangy and is graying, dammit, and I'm without back hair, for what it's worth. Thankfully, I am acceptable to her, even "hot," as she claims - and far be it from me to call her a liar in that regard, although I privately merely think her blind. We're fortunately financially set now, but this isn't about finances.
While I sought out town boards and tennis partners when we moved about a year ago to here, a "neighborhood rich" area, Sharon found, among other things, an art club to join - a half dozen or so women of several certain ages, mostly from towns nearby, who met monthly at the home studio of Adele, a local female studio and art history professor who enjoys mentoring the ladies of the club, most of whom are more serious and dedicated to improving than Adele's typical college age students. The club, or class, has some women who are pretty damn good in my uneducated opinion, and some who would struggle to fill in the paint-by-numbers genre, judging from the "show" they had at the end of last year's term. Sharon is among the best of the lot, and while she doesn't aspire to going beyond amateur, I know she thrives on getting better as she goes. And so she has done.
In fact, she has become the teacher's assistant, doing those various little administrative tasks that come up, from scheduling to finding best prices on art supplies to arranging their occasional socials. So, it was no surprise that when Adele announced her pending vacation absence, she asked Sharon if she could host it and keep the group on track. Sharon accepted, and she let me know that they would be taking over the living room for the class. I said fine, that I'd just stay out of their way. She said there were others who were out of town as well, so it would be only four students, including her: Annette, a slim brunette, somewhat brash but always fun Southern belle, Margaret, a bit older and suspected but none of my business lesbian who appeared never far from her friend Julia. I often wondered about them, but they're all nice folks for the little I know of them, and I know Sharon enjoys the group, including joining them all for wine after each class, and more and more often coming home a bit tipsy and downright frisky, which has gotten no objections from me whatsoever.
Now, I'm both very respectful of Sharon's privacy, and I've been busy - that damned first serve of mine just hasn't been working lately, so I may have missed the "oh by the way" part that Sharon says she mentioned some weeks ago - but, really, I think I wouldn't have missed that, nope, not that.
Anyway, back to the class workings, since it all figures in, trust me. The students each have this big black cardboard folder thing that's their "portfolio," that is fine for keeping art things from getting bent, folded, or whatever'd. Each student has one, and each week at the end of the class, the students put their completed work in them (or if it needs drying, they take it home, dry it, then put it in the portfolio and deliver it to Adele's home. Then, each week, Adele arrives with the portfolios and her notes carefully paper clipped to them, providing her feedback / critique). The students can either take the critiqued works out, or leave them in the portfolio to keep a semester's class works all together.
When Sharon started, she'd bring home the critiqued works each week, and once I'd gotten her to share them with me - she was too shy at first to show them - we'd discuss them, which meant initially I'd say they were great and she'd bemoan how lousy they were. While I know as much about art as I do about Lower Slobbovia politics, even I could see that over the weeks and months, she'd gotten better - a lot better. That semester was all landscapes, with the class taking short field trips to get good views and such. Then they had a semester of still lifes - flowers and fruit and such - working at Adele's home studio on colors, in acrylics mostly, and perspective and all that. I got a frame and always kept her most recent work displayed proudly in the home, and they all really did work well, tying the room together and all that.
Then they scheduled a short summer term, since the ladies were all enthusiastic, and since Adele was enjoying it and it took little effort on her part. By that time, the novelty had pretty much worn off, and I'll admit I didn't ask her much other than "how was class?" Mea culpa, mea culpa!
So, there we were, getting ready for hosting the class the next week, and Adele had dropped off all the portfolios at our place before she caught her flight to wherever, with the previous session's work critiqued inside them. They were stacked in the corner of the living room, and one afternoon while Sharon was off somewhere, I innocently - I swear, innocently, leafed through the stack and found Sharon's, wondering what they were doing these days and remembering I hadn't updated the framed work since the spring semester.
I found it, sure enough, and when I opened it, was pretty shocked to find it was all sketches - no paints, no colors, just pencil sketches . . . of some naked guy! There were maybe a dozen of them all told, some barely preliminary, some really rushed (Sharon had said that Adele had them sometimes just sketch like crazy for a timed 30 seconds to capture whatever the subject was, which forced them to stop overthinking and just let the pencil fly). And one pretty damned detailed, with appropriate shading to lend reality, and the guy's schlong even more in detail than any other part of his body!
So, the guy - he looked to be college age, lean like a swimmer and well muscled but not all that defined (not the body builder type), shock of dark hair, bit of a vacant, disinterested look, and not a hair between toes and scalp except for an apparently trimmed pubic area, which did little to hide its main attraction. One of those dubious racial looks - could have been Caribbean, maybe Middle Eastern, maybe just Middle European or Greek or something. He wasn't circumcised, which I am, and so there was a bit of discomfort there as well - no real reason, and it probably would have worked the same if reversed, but knowing my wife was sketching something "foreign" to what she was used to made it more intimate somehow, maybe more salacious, than if we'd been of the same configuration. Assuming it was true to life, it was in the "maybe not porn, but also not reluctant to parade it around the locker room" dimensional category. I, on the other hand, am more in the "not statistically an anomaly but no way contestant in a parade" category. That would be to say, I was looking at his robust 4"+ soft, while I carry a slimmer 2 to 3, depending on shrinkage at the time. I was impressed, but not wow'd by the dimensions. I WAS wow'd by finding it in my wife's portfolio of a class I had figured was still on cucumbers of the actual garden variety.
The good news was that there was nothing in the pose, nothing in the tumescence, nothing in the facial expression to suggest that it was anything other than a life study of a guy who modeled and who happened to be undressed, oh, and happened to be better endowed than I, and happened to get his 'nads carefully and I figured faithfully represented in charcoal for posterity by my wife, for cryin' out loud! This was one I was not going to frame for the neighbors to admire, for sure!
So, what to do. I knew I'd not asked for her permission to look, but except at the start she'd always been so eager to share. I knew I'd hadn't asked recently what the class was doing, but she'd never really said. On the other hand, I was pretty sure that if she'd found out I was playing tennis with naked matrons, she'd have thought that was a notable development worth pointing out.
Nothing if not hypocritical and male as all get out, I then really did cross a line - I looked at the other portfolios. Sure enough, there he was in all his glory, in the same pose, which relieved me of the passing - discarded immediately I assure you - me, suspicious? - notion that it was a private session and not a class activity. Small comfort, but comfort nonetheless - and no, I wasn't being all rational and figuring if it had been a private thing that she'd have had it in her class portfolio.
Meanwhile, Margaret and Julia's renditions were downright comical in that Margaret's was a rear shot, very detailed at the shoulders and head, but stopping at the waist, and Julia's a dashed off sketch of the crotch in favor if focus on the hands, and the dimensions of the crotch dimensions diminished if anything, compared to Sharon's.
So now I wondered, as I searched for Annette's portfolio - was Sharon exaggerating those dimensions, or being accurate, or was there even more she was reluctant to expose? Annette's did little to put my mind at rest. In hers, he actually was bigger, obviously so! Both in girth and length, although not by a huge amount. But also, distinctly, in hers the head was peeking out, whereas in Sharon's it was completely covered. I was sort of proud that Sharon's artwork was better, but the size thing, and that turtle head being visible led me to more paranoia. Had Annette been fantasizing what might be? Had Sharon just sketched the genitals earlier, and then later in the session something had occurred that had motivated a bit of growth out of it? And if so, was what Annette sketched all that happened, or was there more, later, uncaptured on the paper? Dang! And in Annette's, she really focused on the cock, virtually to the exclusion of the legs below, and with only haphazard attention to the eyes or expression. But lots of work on the cock, with some erasures and redo's as well - maybe redoing as it grew? Hmmm... Gotta keep an eye on that Annette - possibly more interesting than I'd realized.