Foreword
Firstly a word for those who have reached this via the Romance pages: the first two chapters were published in Loving Wives in the last week or so. Please read those first.
Why publish this chapter here? It seems appropriate to the content. And also because it would be good to have some input from beyond the Loving Wives crowd. If romance is summed up by the immortal Jane Austen ending: "Reader, I married him", Loving Wives is the opposite: "Reader, I divorced the cheating slut and took her for every penny and put her lover in the cemetery. And what happened was all her fault." Don't get me wrong, I enjoy these stories, which carry a primal charge of betrayal and survival in adversity. There are strong elements of the LW trope in my story but I have tried to be fair to both sides and to produce something a little different. Satisfaction comes in a variety of forms.
I appreciate all comments. The trade-off in posting on a free site like this is to find that you have a readership and that at least some of your readers enjoy what you write. That's enough reward. Suggestions for how to write better are always welcome.
Now, on with Caroline Alone. Be kind...
Copyright MortonGrange 2013
*
Jack's research goes well. He's surfing a wave of mental energy released by the upheaval in his life and he looks forward to his time in the library. For hours at a time he can forget about Caroline. Working for the bank now seems like a prison sentence served long ago. When he does think about Caroline he finds that distance gives him new objectivity. So she's human: she fucked up and has to deal with the consequences. It wasn't his fault and he has no reason to feel bad. More than ever before he realises how much he looks forward to being with his children and how vulnerable and precious they are.
His part-time teaching hours come about after a couple of combative tutorials with his professor. He argues strongly for his line on the impact state subsidies for the shipping industry before the First World War. At the end of one such meeting his professor unexpectedly offers a few hours teaching and tutoring undergraduates on their preliminary economic history course.
"I like the way you express yourself," says Professor Pickering. "You say what you think clearly and marshal your arguments with skill. Perhaps business has been good for you and taught you how to get the best out of your mind. Our students will like that. Give them lots of economics and tell them how it is in the real world. There are gaps in your historical knowledge but it won't be difficult for you to mug up on detail."
An income, albeit small, makes a great difference to Jack. Teaching also entitles him to put his name down on a waiting list for University accommodation. When he adds that he's a single parent with children to care for at times, he's given priority and almost at once is allocated a small flat on campus. It's in an enclave of faculty staff, all of whom are in similar situations to his, balancing the precarious life of a temporary academic or visitor with an attempt to establish a stable family home. There's congenial company to stop him becoming depressed, vital discussions with intelligent people and lots of women around. The only reason for going home is to be with the children and he starts at once to plan how he can bring them to stay with him in his new flat.
Of course Caroline objects strongly.
"You can't take my children away from me."
"It'll be good for them to be away from here and you'd be denying them a good time. There are lots of things for them to do and children of their own age to play with. I'll speak to them and see what they think."
"You're trying to turn my children away from me."
"I'm not trying to do anything other than get on with my life. I suggest you do the same."
Caroline's resistance is undercut by her own wishes. Something comes up -- unspecified but no doubt involving Damien -- which means she wants him to look after the children. He agrees to pick them up.
He meets many of his new academic colleagues for the first time when he attends the weekly faculty meeting. A couple of dozen lecturing staff are there, mostly women teaching literature, brews of herbal tea in front of them, a few grizzled male philosophers and a mixed bunch of historians and classicists. Jack is the only specialist in economics apart from his professor among the historians. He says little at first, watching his colleagues interact, astonished by their personal attacks and overt championing of their subject interests. It's not business as he knows it and he wonders how these people work together to produce a course. The professor of literature who chairs the meeting seems to ignore most people who want to speak. She doesn't introduce Jack and he notices one or two people examine him curiously and with what he takes to be hostility. He determines he'll not be intimidated.
He's startled when ten minutes into the meeting Professor Pickering introduces him and suggests there is a lack of economic perspective in the current introductory history curriculum taught to first year humanities undergraduates.
"We should take the opportunity provided by having Jack with us to add some economics to the courses on nineteenth century imperialism and also the course on the rise of fascism."
It's clearly a topic that's been discussed before and like everything else one that raises tempers.
"Not on the agenda," snorts one female post structuralist.
"Don't you ever give up trying to browbeat the rest of us? Who cares what Literature think," is the view of a male philosopher.
"We've agreed in the past that these courses are already overloaded," rules the chair.
"Professor Pickering, you continue to appoint men in spite of the University's policy to achieve gender parity among academic staff," says a slender, auburn-haired young woman opposite Jack. She looks serious and fiercely intelligent.
"Seventy percent of this faculty are women," replies the professor. "I'm doing my bit for gender equality."
""But only forty percent in the University as a whole are women and only twenty percent of professorial staff."
"This is a non-professorial appointment in this faculty."
"We don't need economics, we need more about the experience of women," said a wizened classicist who specialises in sexual practices in fifth century Athens.
"Our students have asked for more economics," says Professor Pickering reasonably. "And the economic issues are especially relevant to the experience of women. Isn't that right Jack?"
"There's a chance to cover the non-waged economy and also include a case study of the impact of the Great Depression on domestic service," says Jack, a little nervous in this bear pit and conscious of every eye on him. He catches the eye of the woman opposite and she looks amused and ready to cut him down.
"If it reduces the ridiculous emphasis on foreign and defence policy then I'm all for it," she says. "Despite the unfortunate impact on policies to secure employment equality and diversity in this unrepresentative university."
"Thank you, Hazel, for your ringing endorsement," says Professor Pickering.
"Well Dr Kirk, do the men have it?" asks the chair sardonically.
"We should have a vote," shouts someone.
"There's nothing to vote on," says the chair. "I hear no alternative proposals. Then we are agreed."