2021 - Nellskitchen. All rights reserved. The essayist asserts her rights as the author of 'The SoHo Karen.' This story or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner (except for brief quotations in a review) without the writer's express (written) permission. If the story appears on a website other than 'Literotica.com,' it is pirated and is absent the author's permission. All characters appearing in "The SoHo Karen" are over the age of eighteen.
THE SOHO KAREN
By Nellskitchen
There is no denying it; both are quite beautiful, the standing woman, though in a milder, less overt sort of way, more so.
By contrast, the kneeling she-beast, the disreputable 'SoHo Karen,' though equally pretty, has tiny breasts and arrogantly flaunts her meanness; its display, a parade of negative energy she refuses to hide.
"Fuck you! I won't swallow," she screeched. "You can't make me. Fuck all of you!" Pursing her lips, and with his massive erection inches away, she jerked her head around and glaring at the jury, she raised her voice, snootily announcing, "I never swallow for black guys--NEVER!"
Having voiced contempt for the judicial process, the girl returned her attention to the dangling cock. Shutting her eyes against the intimidating sight of its uncircumcised girth, and with her displeasure unmistakable, she grudgingly tongued the tip and drew it into her mouth.
The young woman's skill at giving head was evident to the dozen women acting as witnesses, with several doubtlessly skilled fellatrixes in their own right, reluctantly nodding approval. The solitary male, a visibly annoyed government contractor, obviously in a hurry, displayed impatience by glancing at his watch, his only remaining article of attire.
"You best be mov`n this thing along, honey," he warned. His deep, intimidating voice got her attention, especially when he added, "Or my black ass is out`a here."
Popping his cock from her mouth, she snapped at him, saying, "I don't care about your black ass; I demand equal justice!"
"Justice is served once you complete your sentence," Prison Superintendent and Chief Deputy Director Gabriella Dimka mildly reminded.
Standing next to the unlikely pair, and with her straight black hair fashioned into a tight, stylish ponytail, the superintendent, her full breasts surging against the buttons of her close-fitting black leather uniform, was a focus of jealousy, directed at her not only by the genuflecting prisoner but equally by an envious jury--the latter, twelve women of color.
Only yesterday, the jurors had convicted prisoner No. 666.6 of the recently defined hate crime of 'Karen-ness.' Due to the notoriety of the case, all are relieved their obligation to the court is nearly complete. The timing could not be better since several have reported online white supremacist threats. Today, however, they stand witness to the 'Karen's' reckoning.
Supervising the event, Chief Deputy Director Dimka, who rarely involves herself in such unsightliness, is at the center of the mess. Her reason: the 'Karen' committed a 'special victims' offense, requiring the supervisor's direct participation. With its lurid details bandied about on social media and scrutinized in the press, U.S. Attorney Yolanda Adams felt compelled to intervene, requesting that the veteran official personally see to the administration of justice.
During the trial, the judge had carefully schooled the jurors, in the process, broadening the definition of a 'Karen.' She described them as 'neither middle-aged nor blonde, but rather as non-black females who wrongly accuse men of color of preposterous transgressions,' of which the prisoner stands guilty.
"I agree," the judge, in closed session, explained, "that 'Karens' are typically blonde--but in this court's view, they need not be. A true 'Karen' conjures solutions to others' problems concerning any inconvenience to her--though she is not even remotely affected.
"A 'Karen' harasses others," she went on, "and threatens lawsuits, complains, for instance, that a ramp for wheelchair victims has replaced her favorite parking spot, proceeds to park her car in the old spot anyway--then posts a 'vlog' about it."
The jury, attentive, took notes, asked questions, and rendered a guilty verdict after a mere fifteen minutes.
Now, one day later, Gabriella Dimka takes charge of the miserable felon's final humiliation. Given the publicity surrounding the case, she knows if this particular wrongdoer demonstrates no change of heart--the 'Karen Mitigation Program' she oversees will land on the budgetary chopping block.
The kneeling woman, twenty-two-year-old Miya Ponsetto, is a challenging and rabid sort. Displaying utter lack of remorse, she has, despite her conviction, doubled down on her original accusation--that a stranger, a teenaged boy, stole her cell phone.
With the court judging the 'Karen' incapable of becoming a more complete person, she is here to serve out her sentence at the Manhattan Institute for Privileged White Women. Since the Ponsetto case is crucial, Gabriella sees to its details, her expert attention, on point.
The SoHo 'Karen's' punishment is not complicated. Called 'The Grind,' it falls under strict federal guidelines. With lights dimmed, with the jury observing, and the arrogant perpetrator kneeling but fully dressed in a white, Duchess satin blouse, crepe wide-leg black pants, and heels, Gabriella, riding crop in hand, snaps its end squarely onto her palm, signaling the observance's commencement.
'The Grind,' employed in similar cases since the early 2020s, has shown positive results. Though applied sparingly by the courts--some say too sparingly--the number of reported 'Karens' continues to dwindle.
Reading from her tablet, the prison official carefully addresses the unrepentant woman: "Miya Ponsetto, as per court order, the penalty chapter of your detention begins now. The guards will remove your blouse and bra."