There may be parts of this story you don't understand. Try to figure them out. To see how close you came, read "Revenge in Advance." You could read that story first, but it wouldn't be as much fun.
Grateful thanks to
SueDanym
, who once took an oath to first do no harm, hated this story and edited it conscientiously anyway. To clear it from your mind, follow the link to this author/editor's story page, and you'll find no one makes consensual sadism/masochism as tender, affectionate and orgasmic.
*
He heard Letty calling but couldn't make out what she was saying.
"What?!"
"Come here!" she yelled. "I want you to see this."
"Just a minute."
Larry pushed away from his computer and sighed. Something must have popped up on Letty's screen that she didn't understand. As usual, he would have to take care of it. She had been burned once by a virus and once by phishing, so now he was summoned whenever she noticed something unusual.
"What is it?" he asked as he walked into her office.
"Sit down on the couch. I'll show you in a second. First, I want to ask you a legal question."
"I'm not a lawyer."
"It's about a contract. I have almost no experience with them. You know a lot more than me."
Larry quickly scanned the room and looked behind him at the doorway. He now did that instinctively whenever he heard the word "contract." At the same time, he calculated the quickest way to get to his car, which he always kept gassed up for a run to Mexico. He didn't see any nurses wearing clown masks, so he relaxed.
Letty showed no surprise at his frightened reaction. She waited until he gave her his attention again.
"I know a contract is binding on all those who sign it, but what if one side wants to make changes?"
"You're talking about re-negotiating. That happens all the time."
"I knew you'd understand. Can you explain how it works?"
"The party that wants changes simply asks the other parties if they agree. If it's something small, they'll usually go along and rewrite the contract."
"What if it's something big?"
"That's not so simple. If it means less money for the others, they'll most likely reject the change. It's the same if they have to invest more time or resources than called for in the initial agreement. Or if they think the change is not in good faith, they'll also reject it."
"What does faithful have to do with it?"
"Not faithful. Good faith. A person or company asking for the change as a way to put one over on the other party is 'negotiating in bad faith.' If the other parties suspect cheating, they won't agree to the changes."
"That makes sense. Tell me if I have this straight. If I want to make significant changes in a contact and those changes are in good faith and don't cost the other side any additional time or money, there's no reason why the other side shouldn't agree?"
"That sounds right, but a lawyer would know for sure."
"Thanks for the explanation. Now I want to show you what put the question in my mind. Pull up that chair and look at what I just read."
She moved to the side so he could get in front of the screen. He started to read a short news story about a crime wave. At first, the police thought one gang was responsible. But then it started happening all over the country -- not often, but regularly -- and sometimes on the same day. The authorities decided many of the criminals were copycats.
In each case, a small number of women, who called themselves "Me Too Vigilantes," would attack a man in the middle of a crowd, strip him, rape him with a large dildo and further humiliate him while calling him names. He would be released as they ran off. Sometimes before they left, the women held up a large white bedsheet displaying blood-red words: "JUSTICE! MTV."
Each attack lasted less than ten minutes. The man usually required treatment for anal bleeding at a nearby hospital but wasn't hurt enough to be admitted. Within a day or two, videos of the incident were posted on the Internet, showing the man's face and a list of his "crimes," which typically included sexual harassment in the workplace, date rape or physical abuse of his wife, girlfriend or prostitutes. All the videos went viral, garnering tens of thousands of comments.
The women wore masks that were discarded once they vanished into the crowd. They left no clues behind other than the sheets, so the police had no leads. Some foreign websites began posting all the videos, but there was no manifesto or any other sign of organization.
Larry finished reading the story and spat out his reaction:
"Disgusting!"
He started to get up, but Letty pulled his hand.
"Wait! Let me show you something else."
She clicked on another tab and played a video. At first it was difficult to see anything because it had been shot at night with only streetlights for illumination. After a moment, the lighting improved, and he noticed a large group of people using their phones as flashlights while recording a man struggling with three female assailants.
The women somehow got man's pants and underwear off in seconds. There was some activity behind the man hidden from the camera. Then Larry saw a large dildo waved about and fitted to a harness on one of the women. The woman held onto the man and thrust the dildo into him from behind. He screamed as she brutally ravaged him.
When she had enough, the woman ripped the dildo out of him and took off her harness. She let it drop to the ground as she and the other two women held up the sheet with "JUSTICE! MTV" written on it in large red letters. They quickly dropped the sheet and ran into the crowd, darting in different directions. The man collapsed to the ground.