They have airplane simulators to test out who is good pilot material, don't they? So why not a simulator to test out who is good marriage material? At least that's the question that I asked myself after I went through my second divorce of a cheating husband at the ripe old age of twenty seven.
Both James and Trent seemed like great guys who were in love with me and would be true. It turned out that they loved my money, not me. When I was twenty one my very wealthy parents died in a private plane crash and left my brother Aaron and me millions of dollars each. While pre-nups protected me financially from my ex-husbands, they didn't protect my heart or my confidence, and neither one lasted two years.
I began to wonder if there was something about me that made me unlovable. I'm no Kate Upton, but I'm not bad looking. I don't have acne or warts all over my body, I'm in reasonably good shape with what I'm told is a really nice ass, I'm passionate in bed, and I'm nice to everyone. My brother Aaron's kindness, and his insistence that I see a therapist, got me back on track within six months of my last divorce. It was then that I started thinking in earnest about marriage simulation.
My family had actually donated a wing of the main science building at the University that Aaron and I graduated from, so I took advantage of the good will that came with our gifts of several million dollars to meet with the heads of the biomedical engineering and psychology departments, and their top assistants. After getting their assurances that they wouldn't laugh at me, I told them what I was looking for.
"Dr. Swan and Dr. Beetle, what I want is a program and device that will put someone through what marriage is like β especially focusing on fidelity β to determine whether or not they would be a good and faithful husband. It might require one or more devices, written and oral quizzes while hooked up to some truth-telling device, and profiling. I'm not sure how to go about it, but I'm willing to underwrite a research project relating to it. Is there a realistic possibility that something like that is possible?"
Dr. Swan, who is both an M. D. and PhD in engineering, spoke first for the biomedical engineering department. "I'm sure that we can come up with hardware and software that measures truthfulness of a subject in many different ways; and if β I stress 'IF' β there is some relationship between propensity to be a loyal spouse and genetics we can run genome sequencing on test subjects. However, coming up with other aspects of the program is beyond our capabilities."
Dr. Beetle, also an M. D. and a PhD in psychology, and someone who looked like he came out of Central Casting because he fit so well what the public would envision someone with his background and education would look like, stroked his Freud-like grey beard for several minutes while everyone in the room looked at him. Finally he spoke, with his cultured British accent.
"I really do believe that If Dr. Swan's people can do what he suggests that my department can come up with a program that will do the job. This is a very interesting proposition Miss Williams," he said before I interrupted him.
"Please call me 'Ashley' Dr. Beetle."
"Very well β as I was saying, Ashley, this is something that interests me a great deal and I would love to work on it."
"Splendid," I replied, trying to keep my enthusiasm under control but almost clapping my hands together in glee. "What I ask is that your departments, Dr. Swan and Dr. Beetle, come up with a projected cost and time frame for such a program, and an evaluation of what the probability of success is, and that we meet again in two weeks to discuss it further. I would hope that the time frame would be one year or less β I have a very personal interest in this project.
"That sounds like an excellent plan. Charles," Dr. Beetle's first name is Charles but only other PhDs call him that, "let's you and I talk some more after Ashley departs and see who should be assigned what responsibilities," Dr. Swan said as he stood up when I did. He seemed very eager.
To make a long story short, two weeks after our first meeting I gave my go-ahead for a two million dollar project, to be completed within eleven months, to develop the equipment and program for a marriage simulation project. I met with the team leaders for each aspect of the project every three weeks for status updates and brainstorming sessions. I found some of the concepts that the team leaders were talking about to be extremely thought-provoking, intellectually stimulating, and/or bizarre.
Maybe the most bizarre concept β to me anyway β that was imparted to me very early in the process was a genetic pre-disposition to cheat. As Dr. Beetle's top assistant β Dr. Angela Merkel β described it "We have found through research, before we started on this project, that variations in the oxytocin and vasopressin receptor genes play a big part in the propensity for someone to cheat."
"WOW!" I exclaimed, feeling that I should even though I was not familiar with most of the terms she used, let alone the concept. "Is it possible, though, to test for those variations? I mean, how do you get someone's genes, let alone examine them?"
"Probably five years ago β and certainly ten years ago β that would have been impossible," Angela continued, "but now techniques exist for quickly and relatively inexpensively both obtaining a person's genes in a basically non-invasive manner, and assessing the genes once obtained."
"How accurate can the assessment be?" I continued.
"If a person has a particular variant of both the oxytocin and vasopressin genes there is a 40-60% higher probability than in the general population that he or she would be likely to be promiscuous; including cheating on someone who he or she supposedly has an exclusive relationship with," Angela replied with authority.