(starring: Deirdre: - November 2002)
GIVEN this age of political correctness, it's a source of amazement and fury to me that my condition is not recognised. Just about every other weakness of which it's possible to conceive seems to have its lobby group, organisation, support group, monthly magazine, or what have you. There's International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Day, International Sleep Apnoea Day (surely "Sleep Apnoea Night" would make more sense), International Coeliac Day, International days for allergies to this, to that...
Yet my affliction which is as debilitating, inconvenient and restrictive goes completely unrecognised. Not only in an official sense, but even as far as gaining a modicum of sympathy from my peers. I can guarantee if I went to anyone, even those people that would explode in a saccharine burst of sympathy towards a sufferer from peanut allergies or lactose intolerance, expecting compassion and understanding I'd draw a complete blank. Which is why, I suppose, I keep this journal. At least it gives me some chance to vent.
My name is Didi Truelove. Not my real name, but it will do. And I am a natural submissive.
All right, I think I can guess my reader's reaction here. Are, you're into that lifestyle, are you? Chains, whips, tight leather pants. A secret underground dungeon with steel rings set into the walls. A library containing the complete works of John Norman, along with a well-thumbed copy of "The Story Of O." Brass-studded leather collars, cats o'nine tails. Oohhh, kinky, kinky...
No, no, no, no, no, no, no!
Let me be clear here, my philosophy is one of complete "live and let live." The twilight worlds of Doms, Dommes, subs, slaves, switches and kajirae may well be a complete mystery to me, but whatever floats your boat. If you chose that way of living, all well and good.
But I didn't. It's not a matter of going to clubs to get my rocks off, or playing cute little games on Saturday nights to spoice up my love life. If there existed a medication to make my condition go away, I'd swallow the lot, packet as well. Did you get the qualifying word in the description of my condition? All right, let me repeat it, more slowly.
Natural submissive.
Get it now?
No? Well, let me give you an example of what I mean?
It's a warm day in mid November. I've been doing a little shopping, and I'm sitting at a table in The Imperial in Defiance Valley, just north of Edenglassie City. I'm enjoying the air-conditioning, sipping a well-iced gin and orange, vaguely taking on the inane soap opera on the TV just above the bar. My condition has not reared its head for a couple of weeks (or perhaps more precisely I have not encountered anyone with the particular attributes that cause that head to rear) and all is generally well with my world.
And then I see him.
He is not especially well-muscled, not particularly tall, not overly handsome. He is dressed well enough, in a tight t-shirt, designer jeans, well polished, up-market shoes, and wears a high-quality timepiece on his wrist. His hair is a dark brown, his eyes a deep blue. He is well tanned, yet not darkly so. He is drinking a lager, just the common or garden kind, a Stela Artois I think.
And I know.
My condition is not, you see, one that is triggered just by any man. If it were so, I would be unable to function in normal life. Often weeks, or even months, pass where you would never know about my affliction. Like being bipolar, there are fluctuations, currents, natural rhythms.
It is not even a specific type of man that triggers it. If this were the case, I could simply avoid such places where such men are to be found. I could peep into places, see that such a man was there, and duck quickly out again.
It is not, however, a matter of physical type. Men able to take advantage of my condition might be well-muscled or puny, obese or skeletal, short or tall, fair or dark, and of any race. I have no way of knowing, until they choose to exercise their will. Yet, somehow, they too know, presumably at an instinctive level, of my condition.
They do not, of coarse, always choose to take advantage of it. Yet, men being man, so many do.
He catches my eye, holds his glance for the merest second, then drops it back to the automotive magazine open before him on the table. That glance is enough.
Once again, I am enslaved against my will.
At this point let me describe, since it important in understanding my condition, what I am wearing.
A person such as myself does not have much choice. Certain items of clothing, or styles, are out. I cannot, for example, wear pants or jeans. I have experimented with such, and been conscious, all day, that I should not be wearing these things. I feel like a normal person might if they walked around in nappies and sucking a dummy, or clothing woven of human hair, or dressed as a clown. This is wrong. I must not be seen like this. I must go home, right now, and change.
The same goes for flat shoes, tunic-tops, cardigans, thick hose,
Yet though I dress to please men, not wearing things men do not find appealing, let me make it plain I am no exhibitionist. I do not walk abroad in microscopic skirts falling two inches below my private parts, or tops, cut so low a casual glance might revel my navel, or fishnet stockings with seams, or red shoes with six inch stiletto heels, or midriff-bearing tops.
Rather my attire is selected with a view to revealing, while at the same time, making it plain I do not wish to reveal.
I have on today, for example, a tight dress, in a subtle shade of dark blue, decorated with white polka dots. It is sleeveless, yet cut high, with a round neckline. At the waist are a series of loops in which rest a belt, of the same fabric and design as the dress, and which which ties at the rear. My hose are flesh coloured, my shoes black. All perfectly conservative, and decent, and suitable for a woman of my age.
And yet, I notice with a sinking heart, I am showing the man with the lager far, far too much of my legs.
My hem, I repeat, is in no way provocatively high. When I am standing, it falls to about four inches above my knees, normal enough for this season's fashion, all completely respectable. It is not a matter of length that is enabling the man to see so much of my legs, it is the garment's cut, and material, and fit.
I have tried wearing skirts and dresses of a looser cut, of natural fabrics that behave better when seated, of designs less problematical. Sadly, as with jeans and pants and the other things described above, it just does not work. My mind screams to me I have no right to wear them, that I do not dare, that I must return them and select attire more suitable to my lowly position.
I have long ago given up the fight.
So, I sit here, with my dress riding up along my thighs, knowing that though the man is not overtly staring, he is, nevertheless, taking in the sight through the corners of those blue eyes.
My condition does not prohibit - in fact, it encourages - attempts to defend my modesty. Were I simply to pull up my hem, smiling lasciviously, and show him everything I have, it would immediately dispel the hold he has over me. My condition has forced me to wear this too tight dress, and might now rest on its laurels.
I take hold of the hem at the front with both hands, and pull it sharply down towards my knees. Many garments, subject to this corrective action, would respond in a way that puts an end my my inadvertent leg-show immediately, and for a while to come. Not this one. It is far too tight, far too clingy with its synthetic material, far too uncooperative.
Before I have even replaced my hands on the table, the hem has slithered up half of the distance towards where it was when I adjusted it. My attempts to correct it have only served to call attention to the exhibition I am making of myself.
Though I know it to be futile, for I have been in this situation so many times before, I do not let the struggle end there. Now, I lower my hands again, clutching at my hem on both sides, lift myself slightly from my chair and give another sharp, hard tug.
Again, this gains me an inch or two of cover, yet again my advantage is short-lived indeed. The dress mocks me, commencing, the moment I let go, to creep back upwards again. I have mentioned it falls, when I am standing, four inches or so above the knee. When sitting, so tight is it, at its lowest point the gap has increased to at least twelve. I repeat, that represents its lowest, most modest aspect, immediately after I have pulled it down. But even this measurement is quite irrelevant, given the way it is riding up.
Rather the dress' natural state is that of a kind of de facto mini dress rather than the modest length it is designed to be. desperately, I lift myself from my chair, smooth the flats of my hands under my rear, and give the dress a further series of hard tugs, at various points around the circumference of the hem, desperately attempting to keep it in place.