I happened on to a story,
"
Zapped by The Martian Slut Ray
"
by PiperHamlin. I agreed with the premise of the author, it is amazing a device so frequently referred to was not the topic of any stories (prior to the aforementioned). Though the stories are not related, other than the title, I sought and received permission from PiperHamlin for my story.
While the topic sounds as though it might be a SciFi story, I have neither the interest, nor skill to write such a story. Instead, I decided to write a loving wives tale about the development of a Slut Ray. The story is a complete farce. It is told by a lawyer with "interesting" ethics. The story involves no "nice" people. What it does provide is a rationale for so many of the characters in these stories who one day are devoted wives and the next are hopeless cheaters.
If you are one who takes the time to read and comment negatively, I think there are better uses of your time (but look how I am spending mine). I appreciate all comments.
One of the unique features of this antilibidinous ray is it has no impact on people until their 18
th
birthday. Therefore, even if the ray were misused, no one in this story under the age of eighteen would engage in any sexual activity.
Everything hereafter is tongue-in-cheek. No actual sluts were created.
<><><><>
This might be the strangest story I will ever tell. It happened to me.
I participated in the development of a Martian Slut Ray, though ultimately it got a different name.
I
am Larry Preston, a patent attorney with Givens, Burnham, and Downs (or if you live in the Detroit area, you may know us as Burn'em Down).
Most people apply for patents online these days. The US Patent Office has district offices in five cities for various regions of the country. As I mentioned, I am in Detroit, which is in the Midwest region. People in this region are usually assigned a patent examiner from the Detroit Patent office. Consequently, Burnham and Downs have a number of attorneys who specialize in helping people through the process.
People can contact us at any point in the process of getting a patent: before they apply, during the process, or even just during the review with the patent examiner. I was contacted by a man named Frank Pope. He said he was from a place called French Lick, Indiana and wanted to apply for a patent. We had a brief conversation and he retained me to represent him. I asked for him to send me what he had.
The next day I received a package and started reviewing it. He had developed an electronic device to relax muscle groups using a pulsing heat
.
I looked through his drawings, like many patent attorneys my undergraduate degree is in engineering, the concept was fascinating.
It was also troubling.
I made a phone call to Ed Thomas, another client of mine. My message went to voice mail, I told Ed it was urgent.
Edison Thomas is a famous inventor who lives in Bloomfield Hills, a wealthy suburb of Detroit. I have worked with Ed on many occasions, most recently on his Relaxatorâ„¢. The Relaxatorâ„¢ is a device which emits a pulsing series of frequencies of infrared light, which reduces anxiety, particularly in women.
The patent was in progress, and we were looking forward to receiving it in a few weeks.
The two devices described their intent differently. One reduced anxiety or put another way changed mood. The other reduced muscle tension, which seemed to me to be toward the same end.
Also troubling, the circuitry for the devices was remarkably similar.
I feared the patents might interfere with one another. The government can get touchy and say the two devices are too close together for both to receive a patent.
Now, it might be no big deal, in the large view, but as an attorney, whose fees would be halved, my desire was in protecting my second client's interests. Being ethical as I am, that meant contacting the first client, to also protect his interests and in the process, generate more billable hours from my approach.
Is this great? Or what?
I picked up my phone and said, "This is Lawrence Preston."
"Larry, this is Ed Thomas, returning your call."
"Ed! I have an unusual situation. I have received a request for representation for a device which has certain similarities to the Relaxatorâ„¢."
"Well, I am just a lowly inventor, not familiar with all the legalities here, but I applied first. What is the Latin legal phrase for, 'too fucking late?'"
"It isn't that simple. Without getting into detail, his patent is for a device with a different intent, and I think it should get approval. But I am hedging my bets, a bit."
"Excuse me. I was born at night, just not last night. I may not be an attorney, but I'm not stupid. You just want two fees out of this."
"True. But it is bigger than that."
Always tell them there is something bigger, it makes you look altruistic.
"The use is enough different that I think society would benefit from both devices."
"Right." If sarcasm had a color, the word would have been bright that color. "You are a true humanitarian. What do you have in mind?"
"First, let me ask this, does the name Frank Pope mean anything to you?"
"Oh, shit. Not the hick from French Lick."
"I take it you know him?"
This was getting worse, for me, that is. I had covered this in an article I wrote, 'A Darwinian View of Ethics'. In the article I espoused an evolving understanding of right and wrong which would enable me (and others so disposed) to change their position completely and still be on the side of the angels. Unfortunately, no legal journal would publish it -- though one turned me into an ethics committee (I thought for consideration of my views -- though that might be hopeful, on my part.)
Ed was talking, I forced myself to listen, "We went to Purdue together. He always called himself that. French Lick is a great resort town in southern Indiana, small but a wonderful place to spend time. He and I were great friends until we fell out -- over a girl."
"Tell me, Mr. fuck him I was first, is it a coincidence that good friends came up with similar patent ideas?"
"Not really. We worked on a device we laughingly called the doxylator, together."
"And this doxylator is part of your design?"
I was nearly despondent. Two huge ideas (with the intendent attorney's fees) going up in smoke in only one fire.
"No. Not at all. Well, not really..."
Now I was getting pissed, "Swell. So, it is. At least the basics of it."
Well, shit and fall back in it. Greed is a terrible thing. I am trying to extend one client to two and if I'd just gone the other way, and told the second guy I had a conflict, I could sue the second guy for infringement. More money in a suit, than in two happy clients. I should call the ethics committee, Darwinian ethics would allow turning on a client.
"Like I said, not really. I used our brainstorming about the doxylator to develop my circuits. But there was never a doxylator, so I could not have copied it."
"What kind of a name is doxylator?"
"Sounds scientific, doesn't it? We tried to think of a name that said what it did. There is no way to make slut-maker sound scientific. So, we used a synonym of slut; doxy."
"Hence doxylator. I get it." I shook my head; engineers should not be allowed to play with words -- that is the province of lawyers. Then, it came to me. "The Relaxatorâ„¢ hardly has anything to do with being a slut, does it?"
"Being honest, it has more to do with it than you'd think. When are you your most relaxed?"
"After mind-blowing sex?"
"That would be the time. Let me ask you this. As my attorney, could you see through a potential conflict and get two inventors together? There is this one complication."
Swell, no sense in any part of this being easy.
"Complication?"
"He stole my girl. I swore if I ever saw him again, I'd kill him."
"Oh, is that all?" I said like it was a trivial matter. "And do you plan to? It may be indiscrete, but I feel honor bound to ask."
"No, his wife and I were going to get married, but she was a cheating slut before we got married. Much as I hated him at the time, he saved me a lot of grief."
I wished I had pushed harder on Darwinian ethics.
"Well, if I had thought of getting you two together, the way I would have managed it is to ask both of you, as my clients, to come to a meeting. I'd have introduced you to one another at that meeting and let you simultaneously learn about our issue."
Ed looked bemused, "You can still do that. I can say I don't recall us ever having discussed anything like this."
It is good to have clients who see the truth as a football field; you don't need to run down the center of the field, just don't go out of bounds. (You of course hire an attorney to define where the boundaries are). "You'll have to be as surprised as he is."