Like many others, I think Richard Gerald is an excellent story teller, but "Another Love" leaves me with a deep sense of injustice (by the way, Richard has given me permission to publish this and I thank him for it, and I want it acknowledged that no other story on Literotica has ever prompted me to write an alternative ending so he must be good -- he definitely got my blood pressure up!).
I really enjoyed Parts 1 and 2 because I thought they were completely plausible, and he portrays Karen as a normal, loving wife (with a rather large flaw, I think) who feels justified in what she's done. Rob is portrayed as a quiet, strong, and dependable husband who is perhaps a little lacking when it comes to opening up about his emotions.
However, I can identify with Rob and like a lot of men I feel strong emotion even though I may not always display it or vocalize it. For this reason I found Parts 3 & 4 to be completely out of character for Rob, especially after his words at the end of Part 1 when he called Karen a "beautiful whore" and then said "she is nothing to me now". I felt he had too much integrity, and pride, to be coerced into a threesome. He would see that he was again being manipulated into accepting something that was completely at odds with his views on marriage and fidelity.
He would already be hugely wounded by the discovery of Karen's infidelity, so to have Avril and Phillipe's family filling his apartment at Thanksgiving, plus his sons who were always aware of her adultery yet never told him, would only add to his anguish by constantly reminding him of the other life Karen had led. Imagine how he must have felt while they were all laughing and smiling together just like old times while he was the outsider - the stranger - in his own house.
Well fuck that! I could never accept that scenario so I decided to place myself in Rob's shoes and write down why I would no longer stay with Karen.
I also wanted Karen to realize that Rob was leaving her not so much because of what she'd done, which would have been reason enough, but more because he'd changed as a result of finding out. He even apologizes to her for the change in the way he sees her, and I like to think this approach would make Karen more remorseful (assuming she's even capable of remorse) than if he'd just endlessly abused her and called her every name under the sun. Besides, he's not an asshole and it's obvious from his final two paragraphs that he still feels something for her despite making up his mind to leave.
Some readers may notice a very slight similarity with Jezzaz's "Words", but only in that the husband is trying to make the wife see the type of person she really is and the damage she's doing (or has done in this case) to the marriage using only words.
This alternative ending should ideally be read after Part 2 of "Another Love" by RichardGerald but with one difference -- it occurs late on Sunday afternoon, the day after Avril's visit and before Karen arrives home later in the week. The scene opens with Rob sitting at a desk in front of the painting and writing a letter, and I've presumed that Avril has told Rob a lot more than was revealed in Part 1, but no more than what Karen reveals in Part 2 (and which Avril would already have known).
-----------------------------------------------------
My dearest Karen,
For two days now I've just sat and looked at Phillipe's portrait of you, and it is indeed a beautiful painting. I see the bedroom we decorated together, your grandmother's chair, and the bed we shared, made love in, and snuggled in with our boys when they were young. I see the love in your eyes and the enigmatic smile on your face, just as I've seen it for all our married lives.
But now I know that I was not alone in sharing those special moments and building those intimate memories. The love that I imagined we equally shared turns out to be less than equally shared. You received all of mine, but I didn't receive all of yours.
When Avril arrived yesterday she was stunned to discover that I knew nothing of your extramarital life. I think even she was appalled at how I'd been treated, and I'm sure this is why she eventually, though reluctantly, told me everything about your love affair with Phillipe. At first I refused to believe what she was telling me but she related so many things about you and our family - and she knew her way around our apartment - that I had to believe her. If I had any doubt, then I only had to look at the painting in front of me to confirm all that she said.
From what Avril has told me your affair started about a year or so after the birth of Oscar. She described how you were going through a period of depression and had lost interest in sex with me, and that Phillipe had re-kindled your appetite and that I was the benefactor. I suppose I should be grateful for that, but I don't believe you entered the liaison with the objective of improving our marriage.
Hell, there are plenty of professional counsellors who do nothing but get marriages back on track but I suppose a good fuck or two behind my back was quicker and cheaper and, of course, far more exciting.
Karen, I know I'm not the sort of person who expresses emotions easily, and I'm probably difficult to talk to when discussing emotional things, but couldn't you have tried just a little harder to be honest and confide in me at that time? I know I would've understood and together we could've made our marriage even stronger.
Instead, you turned away from me and found love and understanding elsewhere, and it was the beginning of 20 years of deceiving me in a cruel and selfish way.
Avril told me you love me, and that your affair was just a response to a period of self-doubt that you went through. Hell, it must have been some doubt and some period for it to last at least 13 years of physical adultery and 20 years of emotional attachment, only to be finally broken by the death of your lover three short months ago when you attended his funeral. I thought your recent need to "get away" to visit the boys was just empty-nest syndrome, but I think the real reason is that you're still mourning the loss of your lover.
According to Avril your affair was a loving, pure, and beautiful one and somehow was justified because of that. I doubt you'll be at all surprised that I don't share that opinion. If it was so pure and beautiful why did you hide it from me for the last 20 years? May I suggest that not having to think about children, bills to pay, or obligations to other people and all the other mundane things in life would make any extramarital love affair seem pure and perfect, but the real world has to intrude at some point.
No matter how I try to see it from your point of view I still see a wife who has lived two separate lives -- a mundane but happy one with her unsuspecting husband and an exciting, illicit one with her lover.
I have no problem with the open marriage that Avril and Phillipe had. I gather from Avril that their children and Phillipe's wider family all knew of it and it was accepted because they told each other everything -- there were no secrets between them. You willingly joined their "marriage", even to the extent of having Avril and Phillipe in our house at the same time and taking turns in sharing Phillipe, but there was one important difference -- unlike Avril, you did it without your husband's knowledge and deliberately kept it secret from him!
Karen, what sort of woman are you that you could expose your soul and give your body to your lover for all those years, even to the extent of involving your children, yet keep your own husband totally blinded? From what I can make out you were meeting your lover over at least a 13-year period. Yours was no short-term affair, and surely you must have considered leaving me for him. You had the option at any time of choosing either me or Phillipe, which would have been the honorable thing to do, but chose to keep us both. Was it because you knew you could never have Phillipe entirely to yourself, so you still kept me as a sort of long-term backup?
What is unforgivable is that you, Avril and Phillipe all knew where you stood, but I never knew I was competing with him for your continuing love and affections and you never bothered to tell me. I'm sure you think I'm incredibly gullible because I never suspected, but I was never guilty of being gullible -- I was instead guilty of being so in love with you that I trusted you unconditionally to be as faithful to me as I have always been to you.
They say love is blind, and I was certainly blind to what you were doing. Being so much in love does that to a man and I never once suspected. Hell, why should I even suspect? -- after all, it was me you fell in love with and married and me who fathered our children. It was me you vowed to be faithful to and it was both of us who created a home and a family.
Your lover was none of these things and did none of these things. All your lover ever did was take advantage of your fragile mental state to befriend you and then seduce you, and you fell completely under his spell and he under yours.
Karen, was I really so useless that you could do this to me? Did I somehow fail you so much that I deserved to be cuckolded for 13 years? Even the dog I had when I was a kid was more faithful than you, and he loved me back 10 times over for all the love I gave him. I only asked for equal fidelity and love from you, but you couldn't even manage that.
Have you ever had the courage to look deep inside yourself and ask why you did this, or is it somewhere you don't want to go because you're afraid of the real answer? I honestly believe you need some professional help to understand who and what you are, because despite what you may believe this was not a "loving thing" and you never owed Phillipe anything -- he'd already taken his payment from your body and I'd bet you weren't his only married conquest.
I understand you soon fell in love with Phillipe, even though your affair started as a purely sexual one, but to me he was a less than honorable man. He knew you were married but seduced you anyway, and he would've known of the likely consequence for you if I ever found out. You can protest all you like that he was caring and loving (just like you say I am, but your words don't carry much weight now, do they) and that he "helped" you when you needed it, but you could've sought help in more conventional ways without betraying your marriage in the process. Hell, you could've really thought outside the square and discussed it with your husband!