GENIUS GIRL
The receptionist led me through a series of halls and doors until we reached a large, comfortable conference room, "Please make yourself comfortable, Ms Avery. Can I get you anything? Coffee? Water?"
"No thank you Kelly, I'm fine." I always make it a point to remember the names and be nice to the "help", if you will, and I recognize that's a pejorative term. But while everyone else is sucking up to the big bosses, it's the people on the ground level who get shit done. She smiled back at me and turned away, leaving the door open.
The stylish woman was already standing and walking toward me, "So nice to meet you in person, Ms Avery. I'm Janet Taylor, the staffing manager for the engineering department. I'm the one who did the phone screen with you, I'm sure you remember."
"Yes, of course Ms Taylor. You can call me Alex though."
"Great Alex. Well, we will just wait a few minutes until the rest of the interview team shows up before we get started." She was friendly, non-committal, caring and gentle in a very non-specific way that must be a class at HR school.
That was fine; I'm perfectly comfortable sitting quietly in awkward silence and not feeling the slightest bit awkward about it. After the third other person entered and took a seat, Janet started off the interview. "So Alex, you know me, Janet Taylor, Staffing Manager, and my pronouns are she/her. How about you introduce yourself, and then we'll go around the table."
"Hi everyone, Alex Avery, my pronouns are zie/zir..." I picked up on Janets cue, then told them about my experience. It was all in my CV, but this is the game, so.....
Next up was, "I'm Dr. Geoffrey Baxter,...." important something or another, thinks he is all that, probably get's by on being 6'2" and very handsome. But uses so damn many buzzwords it makes me cringe. And who needs 3 minutes to introduce themselves, anyway?
"Hi Alex, I'm Tammy Anderrson, Chief Engineer." The woman was what you'd call non-descript: medium height, medium weight, medium hair, medium eyes, medium everything;... that name sounded vaguely familiar.
"Um, OK, I'm Ben... Aabrams, one of the process engineers."
So it was going to be Tammy and Ben who are the brains here; pay attention to them. The interview went like they always do. They made me an offer, and I accepted it without much argument. It was slightly less than I was getting now; but money is not really my primary concern. I'm confident I could have got more if I'd felt like arguing about it, but mostly I just needed an escape from the travesty that was my last employer.
My old boss was a complete, obnoxious jerk who unabashedly hit on me at every opportunity, and was totally inept. But I had, let's just say, taken measures, that his total incompetence would be shortly exposed; so my primary goal was to not be there when it all happened. And so I wasn't. But I did get to hear about it later from some of my former colleagues; which is a great story, BTW.
----
As I'd suspected, Tammy was my new boss. She didn't say much, and didn't bother me much, but what she said always mattered. Usually I worked with Ben, who was kind, and crazy smart, even if a complete social disaster. He was fine around me, but any time a 'pretty woman' entered the room he totally stopped functioning. It would have been really amusing, except I felt bad for him because he's actually quite a sweet kid.
About a month into the new job, Ben and I had a meeting with Tammy to go over a stack of calculations for a 3-component distillation process we had put together. Also in the meeting was another engineer, Jack, who had reviewed all our work.
"So, these number seem to be inconsistent. First of all, let's look at your report of uncertainty. Jack, I don't see any comments you made to the uncertainty analysis, did you review it?"
"Um, well I didn't see anything wrong with it?"
"So about that: OK Jack, we understand that you don't know anything about statistics, so why didn't you have Allison look at it?"
Nobody had an answer to that.
"The first problem with this is, that you totally failed to consider the error associated with the equations of state. What EOS are you using?"
Here Ben lit up, this is his specialty. "We're using IFC97 for steam and water, of course, and NASA-Janaf for air, and Peng-Robinson for hydrocarbons.."
"Peng-Robinson? Why not NISTRefprops? At these conditions Peng-Robinson has as much as 2% error. So OK, fix that.
Then the next thing is, your isentropic efficiency for this compressor is put in at 63.2% Is this based on vendor data? It's not listed in the references, and 3 sigfigs implies that....
........ so the results you are reporting are not consistent with the uncertainty target. We can never agree to performance guarantees unless we have better than 3%. And for this particular project, you read the RFP, right?, for this one we need better than 1%."
And then she spent another 20 minutes taking us apart in the most humiliating way. I was thinking that I should just crawl into a mudhole and end my life right there. My first opportunity to demonstrate my competence at a multi-national engineering firm, and all I demonstrated is that I'm way out of my league. I struggled to keep up with what Tammy was telling us; I barely understood half of it.
As we walked out, I was shattered; Ben on the other hand seemed pretty happy. I said he is entirely, socially inept, right?
"Ben, how the fuck can you be happy after we just got our asses handed to us?"
"Huh? What are you talking about?"
"Tammy just tore us to pieces!"
"Well no, she just identified 6 things we need to correct. We need to have Allison fix the uncertainty analysis; incorporate the uncertainty associated with the EOS....."