Here's two short stories for the price of one!
Both have me taking my clothes off facing a sofa and a young man upon it, watching me. In one case a friend, in the other a foe.
The first story, framing the second one, plays when the woman-protagonist (I) is all of twenty-eight years old, a psychotherapist too! She subjects a cocky young man at a party to an embarrassing instance of exhibition. No apology needed, he asked for it. And she facilitates his embarrassment by exhibiting herself, to no embarrassment on her part. Why not? Because she is a seasoned exhibitionist. How so? Well, the second story, in the middle, explains how she got started. You guessed it, she first exhibited herself at a party, about ten years earlier, in her first year at college.
Hope you don't get confused. You won't! I am confident a reader of your stature can handle what I offer here, the way I offer it. Above all - enjoy!
________________________________________
I am twenty-eight years old when all this happens, a bout of frolicking at a party. An experienced, self-possessed woman -- I have entertained an estimated one hundred men in the flesh and many times that number through casual teasing. I operate my own practice as a psychotherapist. During working hours, I am a serious and focused professional and in my spare time a player. Any serious playing, such as the frolicking in the story that will follow, I never do in my own city, but only out of town, in other cities. Unfortunately, society expects exemplary behaviour from its psychotherapists, even in their spare time. I carry out an avoidance strategy, i.e., take myself elsewhere.
Ever since I left home, I have been a naughty girl. That is, from the moment I went to university to study psychology. And I continue to be naughty as a young practising psychotherapist. Now, I said society demands exemplary behaviour. Would you say it is morally okay to help people take care of their mental health and still privately play games that don't conform to societal norms? My own stance is this. There is method and control in both my madness and my work, so, yes, to me it is okay. The norms that would make it unacceptable are merely societal constructs made by weak, scared men. Yes, by men, as opposed to women. By men scared of women, certainly. The balance of power is changing, but societal norms are largely man-based. My playing and teasing... Women shouldn't be bold and assertive, in control! That is still what society at large thinks. Whatever, I couldn't care less!
Men are a weak, pitiful species, don't you think? OK, I love them, I need their company, I need them inside of me from time to time, I need them to lick me, handle me, slap me occasionally. I really do. Blowjobs, okay, you have to give and get, but I don't greatly care for them per se. And cunnilingus is underrated. From a woman's point of view, certainly. Men have to step up! But we'll never agree on that, me and these men.
Men are a pitiful species, I said. Well, okay... let's say there are men and men. The latter simply can't control themselves, just as bees can't resist honey (and flies can't resist shit, if you prefer.) Bad news if you're a woman who doesn't happen to need the attention of such a man. The better kind of men, I can live with. I have no trouble admitting that some of my friends are that kind of man. I love that kind dearly.
________________________________________
The following is a short story in which a man of the pitiful kind plays the starring role. The setting is a party. Before you misinterpret the above and get the impression that I am a downright man-hater, please note that I left the party with a specimen of the other kind of man and that he gave me a very good time indeed. I guess my companion did too, but you have to ask him. I generally try my best, but I never ask how I did.
________________________________________
I was visiting a friend in a faraway city for a few days. As I said, I was strict: wild nights could only happen far from my home city. Away from home, upholding my reputation as a psychotherapist is of no consequence.
On the night in question, my friend took me to a party she had been invited to. The more the merrier, she said. My friend was (is) a ton of fun, so I was happy to tag along. The crowd were in their twenties and thirties, our age group, and artists, wannabes and hangers-on. My kind of audience, because art as the key to the meaning of life is very close to my heart, and, no less important, the artsy folk have a great tolerance to any kind of behaviour.
I didn't know anyone there except my girlfriend. So, it was a great opportunity to meet people. I am not shy.
I acted with restraint initially, chatting here and there about this and that, with women and with some interesting men, dancing a bit, with some of the men and with my girlfriend and her friends. Then I got talking to this macho jerk who claimed to be an erotic master and able to control his erections with precision.
Wow! What a feat! I was impressed! (No, I wasn't.
A
) It's a useless act.
B
) I was sure he couldn't.) What it was for me, was an opportunity to play.
'Master your erection,' I said. 'You mean being able to move your cock from flaccid to erect and back again at will?' 'Yes,' he said, 'that's what I mean.' 'Without touching it and regardless of what is happening around you?' 'Yes,' he said. I said that he would not be able to keep his sword down at will. I could certainly raise his cock again, regardless of his will. He was cocky and boisterously insisted that he could erect his organ or, on the contrary, keep it down, regardless of what I did. Yes, he could. No, he couldn't. Yes, he could. (He was also drunk, a point that could have helped his claim). Our discussion -- I was at polite-conversational volume, he was rowdily loud -- began to attract some onlookers.
Would he please prove it? He appeared keen and invited me to follow him to the toilets. 'No,' I said, 'Thank you very much, but I decline the invitation on the grounds that I want everyone here to see your great achievement. And, of course, I don't trust you.'
I urged him to drop his trousers there and then. This proposal raised applause from all sides. 'But what,' he asked, 'if he should win?' Should he stay down, I promised him, he could have me for the night. Should he fail - and I gave him an advantage by promising not to touch him - he was to remain naked and tied to the sofa, the laughing stock of the partygoers who would be able to incite and monitor his member's movements for the duration of the night.
His pride was not at its peak, half-mast, so to speak, but he gave in. Maybe he was already getting cold feet, but what could he do? I was committed and he was drunk. His head low, he dropped his trousers. And sat down on the sofa. Bottomless. A flaccid member in a bed of unkept pubic hair.
'Alright! Now first the easy part of the challenge. Lift your penis without me or anyone seducing you. Let us see.'
He looks a little tense, but he ventures inside himself and concentrates. Lo and behold, his member stiffens slowly. Wonderful. A good size, I must say. Slightly tilted to the left -- his signature.
But it takes much longer for his thing to go limp again. He has to concentrate very hard for that. Or un-concentrate.
But I look around, see people nodding, and we'll grant him a win. For
Part One
of the challenge.
'Well done! Not bad!