Painting Trees, Painting Flowers, Painting Sarah
Sarah finally celebrates what she paints by instilling how she feels.
Sarah Simoni-Laughton's favorite holidays were obscure ones compared to those who loved the bright, colorful lights of Christmas or the explosive fireworks of the Fourth of July. The theme of her art befitting her favorite season, both of her holidays were a bit more than a week apart in April. They were Earth Day and Arbor Day.
Except for the fictional characters of Robin Hood, who lived in Nottinghamshire's Sherwood Forest, and, perhaps, Rubeus Hagrid from Harry Potter fame, who lived somewhere deep in the enchanted mind of J. K. Rowling, not many people celebrated Earth Day and Arbor Day in the way that Sarah celebrated them. Without parades, lights, and fireworks, without people wishing her happy this day or happy that day, she celebrated them quietly and privately by painting landscapes of the Earth and by painting trees. Ever since she was a little girl she felt a quiet connection to the Earth and that connection inspired her art, so much so that she seldom wore shoes, that is, of course, unless she was walking the dirty city streets.
In tune with nature, it wasn't unusual to find her with her arms outstretched and her head tossed back allowing the cool breeze to float her long, curly hair so much like the loose leaves of fall. While she watched the clouds float by and listened to the gentle rustle of the leaves of the trees, the warm kiss of the sun on her face was one of the things that grounded her. The juxtaposition of the Earth, the moon, the sun, and the stars made her feel so much like the ant that walked across her toes; one infinitesimal part of the whole. Much like an American Indian asking her God to smile down upon her this day, this was the preferred posture she took prior to painting and this was how she focused and connected with the earth to inspire her art.
"I love the feel of the brown, soft earth beneath my feet and the deep, green grass between my toes while staring up at the white, puffy clouds in the big, blue sky," she said smiling and ready to share her love of life with anyone there watching her enjoying nature before setting up her easel in preparation to paint.
An easygoing, happy, free spirit, she was a nice girl. Most artists she knew were moody, volatile, self-absorbed, and angry. They captured so much of their angst in their paintings that their art was too violent for her to enjoy. Unlike Sarah, they weren't very nice people. Generally, they were too angry to paint landscapes and still life or so she thought. Certainly, how can you paint something as beautiful as a flower or a tree if you are so angry with the world?
What was a struggle for them was easy for her. She loved to paint and wasn't tortured by the experience of it before, during or after painting what she saw and what she imagined. Unlike so many struggling artists, she never stared at a blank canvas wondering what to paint and unlike so many artists she knew, she finished every canvas she started.
Imagining trees with angry faces and branches that threatened anyone who passed nearby, she imagined hostile flowers with teeth that bit the shins of those who dared trounce them as they walked. Who would and why would a painter want to paint an angry landscape when nature was so very beautiful? Besides, she'd laugh, she didn't want angry paintings of the beautiful landscapes of the trees and flowers that she painted. Certainly, that would contradict what she was trying to paint and counteract the peacefully happy mood she was intent on instilling in her art.
Yet, even though, oftentimes, angry, emotion filled art is better than nice, emotionless art, because of what she painted, her art didn't require that kind of hostile emotion, or so she thought. Anger was detrimental to her style of painting, she assured herself. Instead, she worked at meditating and remaining calm to clear her mind, focus her energy, and to channel her creativity from her brain to her fingers, before even picking up her paintbrush. She wanted nice paintings and what she lacked in angry emotions and what her paintings lacked in fire and intensity, she more than made up for it with her raw, artistic talent.
She loved painting pretty landscapes with healthy trees and colorful flowers, especially trees. She loved trees. Trees supported live. Trees produced oxygen. Trees gave shade. Trees offered themselves up to make houses and furniture and the paper she used to create her paintings of trees. Inspired as a little girl when having to memorize and recite James Kilmer's poem, Trees, she's had a love affair with trees and has been painting trees ever since.
Trees by Joyce Kilmer
I think that I shall never see A poem lovely as a tree. A tree whose hungry mouth is prest Against the earth's sweet flowing breast; A tree that looks at God all day, And lifts her leafy arms to pray; A tree that may in summer wear A nest of robins in her hair; Upon whose bosom snow has lain; Who intimately lives with rain. Poems are made by fools like me, But only God can make a tree.
Equally inspired by the impact that Joyce Kilmer's poem, Trees, made on her, modern times showed the necessity of people to take more of an active role in ecology and conservationism to save and protect the planet. Her art was just as inspired by a stanza she read from Ogden Nash's poem Song of the Open Road that parodied Joyce's famous poem, Trees.
I think that I shall never see A billboard lovely as a tree Indeed, unless the billboards fall, I'll never see a tree at all.
She had hundreds of canvases of trees, of flowers, and of flowers and trees. Everyone who saw her paintings loved her landscapes. Yet, after buying her art, living with it, and staring at it for a while on a daily basis, if there was one common constructive criticism about her work, it was that it lacked movement and motion. It lacked emotion.
Her art didn't shock the viewer by grabbing them, pulling them in, and moving them with the scene. Her artworks weren't paintings that viewers couldn't stop themselves from staring at nor were they paintings that every time the viewers looked at them they noticed and felt something different. That wasn't her intention to paint scenes that were so intense, so moving, and so touching that they hypnotized the viewer making the viewer unable to look away. Her inspiration was to paint calm, relaxing and nice landscapes.
Only, her paintings were stagnant and didn't invoke the curiosity and interest of what else was to the right, to the left, or behind what she painted. Much like a one dimensional photograph taken by an uninspired photographer, her paintings represented a moment in time, a snapshot of what she saw, and nothing more. Imagine Claude Monet's paintings, especially his famous Water Lilies, without movement and without emotion. His ghostly images of trees and the colorful lilies that the shimmering pond water reflected back gave depth to those otherwise flat landscapes that Sarah so enjoyed painting.
That is not to say that her work was not good. It was very good. Her paintings were marketable, as the colors she painted somehow always complimented someone's living room furniture or contrasted someone's grand design plan. Yet, as marketable as her work was, it was unremarkable. Her paintings were much like her. Without provocation, they were nice, too nice to be considered of importance.
The type of person who always saw the glass as half full and who only saw the good in people instead of the bad, her character and how she felt about people and life colored her landscapes, as much as her paintbrush. Painting landscapes relaxed her and made her feel as one with the Earth, yet those emotions of serenity and inner peace were those that came through and derailed her paintings from spectacular to just good. Certainly, her paintings would look great in a bank, a doctor's office, and/or in someone's home. Yet, even though the beautiful scenery she painted was good for her soul and the souls of others, it did little to spark the flame of interest for her to be more noticed. Her paintings didn't stoke the fire she needed to have internally lit inside her for her to be a successfully renowned painter. To take her to the next level, her art needed more agitation to not only set it apart from the others but also to draw the attention necessary to make her work great.