"…I'm a scientist, so I pay attention; observe what works; what works BEST, and keep doing that or improve on it."
"Yes, scientists do love to experiment. I can be a pretty good 'lab rat'."
"Can you? Are you a willing subject? We are very methodical; take our time."
"Well I guess it depends on the beginning hypothesis…"
"I'll have to formulate one. Something that would prove that making love to a woman would be an amazing experience; that their body would respond very favorably to stimulation."
"Hmmm, I need elaboration on the stimulation techniques applied and the rate of application"
"Well, a variety of techniques would be employed. Specifically, fingertips, at random areas, random intervals…
This hypothesis will likely require a large amount of hands on testing to be proven…"
"Mmhmm...."
"…starting with an opening question that reads something like "the effects of external oral stimulation on pulse rates in the test subject coupled with measuring the pulse point stimulations of touch and taste.. ," as a suggested working title."
"I like it, please begin to outline the experiment for me by answering some questions. Will the subject be restrained?
"Yes that will be part of the testings; a significant one."
"Is the tester the original theorists or an unknowing researcher?"
"The theorist is me, and I'll be participating actively in all testings."
"Ahhh, I see. So the test results could possibly be biased?"
"Definitely. Heavily in favor of producing the desired effect."
"Possibly to the point of altering the original theory to match the outcome?"
"Yes. Recursive testing may ensue until desired effects are reached."
(note: subject is demonstrating early signs of arousal prior to initiation of experimental sequence. Possibly caused by verbalization of the testing applications to be applied)
"I have found all theorists at some point or another will show bias to their own opinions. Do you intend to compensate for that factor?"
"Yes. It is called "observational selection."
"I see."
"It is done by choosing the data points that support your thesis, and conveniently omitting any contrasting data. I'll have to watch for data outliers and treat them accordingly."
"Of course."
"Maybe a little more specifics on the actual testing methods to be used is needed for full comprehension."
"All right. Subject will be stripped naked, instructed to lie on a laboratory table."
"Cold? Causing spontaneous stimulation?"
"Yes. They're marble in nature. But subject comfort must be considered, so room temperature will be slightly elevated to compensate for the coolness of the table. Initial reactions expected include; skin tightening, nipple erection, and goose-bumps."
"At this point the subject will be restrained at the arms and legs, with cloth straps."
"Sterile and institutional materials, due to the inappropriate tendency for outside stimulation."
Yes. "Unfortunately, because the effects of anticipatory visual stimulation on test results the test subject will have to be blindfolded for at least part of the experiment."
"Couldn't this also be a stimulation causing factor?"
Yes. "I'm afraid it can't be helped."
"I am struggling with visualizing these tests being put into use. Perhaps you could demonstrate them with me?"
Yes. "That sounds completely acceptable to me. Let's proceed."
(Initial notes... subject's nipples were found to be somewhat erect upon disrobing. Initial examination also revealed the beginnings of vaginal moistening commensurating with symptoms of arousal. Lab temperature was 70 degrees. Subject was led to an appropriate table, and assisted onto the tabletop by researcher. Instructed to lie down; wrists and ankles were then bound with canvas restraints after checking that subject's skin would not be chafed unduly. A new set of observations was made at this point: There was visible pulse in the throat. Some licking of the lips was noted, possibly as a result of the drying effect of accelerated breathing. Nipples presented near fully erect. The presence of some gooseflesh on belly and breasts was also observed.)
"Is the subject all right at this point?"
"Quite."
"Let's continue with the examinations then."
(…once the comfort of the subject is ascertained, examinations continue. Some slight reddening and swelling of external labial folds is already apparent. Again, indicative of early stage arousal behavior.)
Now the subject is blindfolded with a soft dark cloth. As we discussed previously. "Is this acceptable?" researcher asks while holding the blindfold up for the subject to observe.
"Yes. I understand the necessities. But, increasing heart rate should also be noted."
True. Subject is a good researcher as well. "I believe at this point due to the extent and increase of labial swelling another vaginal exam is needed, would you agree?"
"Absolutely."
"The wetness is increasing. We should begin soon, or the test may be completely invalid."
"I do notice a 'warming sensation in the vaginal area."
"Is there a presence of tingling sensations?"
"Some, slight, but ignorable at this point."
.
"We should keep in mind that there is a heavy influence of background preparatory activity on the subject."
"All right."
Random oral stimulation is beginning.
"Good."