Miles recalls celebrating empirical methods in a double blind study with college classmates and dates.
*
Walking toward the particular Gothic arch in a long row of such arches that marked the entry to Mike's dorm suite, in that Spring of 1969, I was on a natural high. Trees were greening up nicely after a dreary Winter, the evening was cool and pleasant, and my former long term best friend, now my girlfriend, was walking beside me.
My girlfriend was a sight to behold. The micromini was the fashion, and it could have been invented with Karen in mind. At five-ten, she was as tall as I am and most of her was gorgeous leg. At the same time, in one of those happy paradoxes so devoutly to be desired, it was the feminists themselves who were burning bras, leaving women's breasts unfettered before the lustful gaze of men. Karen's breasts were not overly large, but they rode high, and her nipples dented her shirt enough to make it clear that there was nothing underneath.
Life was sweet.
"Tell me again who we're meeting tonight? Besides Mike?" asked Karen.
"Well, Mike's girlfriend Susan will be there - the one you said looked like Annette Funicello - and John will be with Wendy, of course."
Wendy was John's fiancee. Mike and John represented two sixths of the occupants of the suite that was our destination. The three of us were members of the same eating club, Princeton's closest equivalent to a fraternity.
"Please don't drool over Wendy's boobs tonight, Miles. It embarrasses me."
"I don't drool, and you know I'm a leg man," I responded loftily, then, grinning, "But I'll try to control the heavy breathing . . ." I flinched as she punched my shoulder.
The other two couples had glasses in hand as we entered the suite. I envied Mike and John their location. The door opened into a comfortable sitting room, complete with fancy mouldings and a bay window, that gave common space to three fairly large bedrooms. The suite accommodated six, but four of the roommates had gone road tripping to Vassar that weekend, leaving the place to us.
After hellos, Wendy said to Karen, "You can settle something for us. How do you rate the guys for housekeeping?"
I looked around. Hmmm, no dirty clothes in sight, at least some horizontal surfaces clear of detritus, including all of the cushions of all of the mismatched furniture and most of the floor . . . Hey the guys had cleaned up!
"No messier than most men, I guess. I mean there is a lot of clutter around, but no obvious dirt, and nothing in a serious state of decay. I'd rate them medium."
"Pay up," John said to Wendy. Turning to Karen, "She bet you'd rate it as 'pigsty.'"
"Hey! What clutter?" asked Mike. Then sotto voice, "Just don't open the door to the armoire."
"Have a drink," said John, handing us the glasses of fruit juice mixed with whatever flavor of alcohol that happened to be in stock that passed for cocktails among us. We all sat and made small talk for the duration of the drink, then Susan asked John what was on tap for the evening.
"Well, we kinda figured we could finish the game of Sloe Gin Spades we started last time, then maybe some Truth or Dare or something."
Sloe Gin Spades was a local rules drinking game, perpetually proposed in hopes of getting the girls drunk enough for the "or something" part of the plan. After all, this was the Sexual Revolution, and we didn't want to miss it. With no incurable STDs and the pill popular with most sexually active coeds, we were ready to place our bodies on the barracades to fight the good fight. As a strategy in this revolution, however, the primary result of Sloe Gin Spades to date had been massive hangovers.
"Maybe a movie," said Wendy, looking at Karen. "Movie," said Karen, looking at Susan. "Movie," agreed Susan, grabbing her sweater.
We strolled down Nassau Street, full of ourselves as only college kids can be. The girls looked great and somehow got into a silly contest trying to outdo each other in parodying the hip swinging sexy walk stereotype. Heads turned. Mike, John and I were really just average kind of guys, but we felt like celebrities with all the attention. At least I did. It was a bit of a letdown when we got to the one theater the town had to offer and found that the feature was some Swedish "art" film.
"These things are so pretentious," groused Susan. "Probably going to be rife with symbolism, saturated with gloom, and boring as hell." She was a math major, but her intonation suggested she'd be changing to the drama department soon.
"Better that than that awful Elvira Madigan stuff," muttered Mike, fearing we were in for a suffocatingly romantic ordeal.
They had both forgotten that there was yet another well known side to Swedish culture. The movie began with a party, at which one of the women attending was accused of being a virgin. Following some ribbing, and derisive disbelief of the woman's protestations to the contrary, the woman took a dare, stripped, and screwed her date in front of the assembled multitude. No actual intercourse was shown and there was no full frontal nudity, but the baring of tits and ass in an overtly sexual context was pretty advanced for the time.
It really was quite erotic in its way.
The remainder of the film was similarly "shocking". Actually, I was shocked - or at least embarrassed - to be viewing this explicit fare with the girls. I was even afraid to try and make out in the theater, not knowing how Karen was taking this. I hoped it wouldn't put a strain on the rest of the evening.
I needn't have worried. When we returned to the suite, the film was the sole topic of conversation.
"Do you guys really get excited over a few bare boobs and butts on the screen?" asked Wendy. "They really didn't show much of the men, but it wouldn't excite me if they did. At least not without knowing something about the guy."
"Superficial," interjected Karen.
"Is it better to date a guy you don't really like for status? Girls do that," said I, realizing my mistake only after the fatal words had left my mouth.
Sure enough, the debate was on. So much for Truth or Dare, or dancing to the stereo. These newly minted feminists had to defend their position. The only good result from the male point of view was that it was thirsty work. I don't think the girls kept track of their consumption as well as they usually did.
Finally, Wendy said that she was irritated with the movie because it seemed to take an unstated attitude that the Swedish women were sexually free, while implying that its American audience could never be so adventurous. Karen and Susan agreed.
I laughed and said, "But it is true . . . none of us here has the nerve to strip in front of the others, much less screw. Let's face it, we're too inhibited to do anything in public."
"I'll bet you couldn't find many Swedes who would be comfortable screwing in front of an audience. The people watching were wearing clothes, for God's sake," observed Karen drily.
I was forced to agree, but still insisted that, aside from a little more freedom permitted by modern birth control, none of us could easily free ourselves from the same cultural conditioning that bound our parents.
"It is well documented," said I, "That Swedes have fewer inhibitions. If the premise is that American women are less free than Swedish women, it's still basically right, even if they exaggerated."
The women angrily protested that it was not so. Not now. They allowed as to how they were children of a new age who would make their own rules.
"I sleep with anyone I want to," said Susan, "I'm just choosy. I don't have my Mom's worries about getting pregnant, and that's what produced the old morality."
The debate went on for an hour or so, dealing on an ever more philosophical level with this most basic of acts (this was college, remember.) Except for John and Wendy. For them the debate seemed more personal, almost tinged with unspoken resentment. It was subtle, but definitely there. Something to do with the loss of freedom that accompanied the mutual commitment to marriage was my sense.