This is my entry in the
2023 Literotica Geek Pride event.
I Am Amanda Watson
Yes, that is a reference to Tom Wolfe's
I Am Charlotte Simmons.
However, I am not fond of Wolfe's overly complex and improbable plot. Nor can I identify with his -- somewhat annoying? silly? -- heroine Charlotte. I've had some problems, but I would never put up with most of the things that she did.
By the summer of 2017, I was twenty and I had finished my sophomore year at the University of Maryland at College Park, MD, just north of Washington, DC.
Just to be clear at the start: I use the words girl, woman, lady, and even chick and female pretty much interchangeably. I'm not dogmatic about such things. However, please don't call us something like a "piece of tail." No one has ever called me that, but I've heard guys use it. I know it's supposed to be jocular -- maybe -- but, just give it a rest.
I'm not the complaining type, but there was something on my mind that had been bothering me for a while. Look, I don't know what my IQ is and even if I did, I wouldn't brag about it.
But perhaps I am smarter than most people; that's just the way I am. I definitely have a wide variety of interests, some of them a bit esoteric. And I know a lot of details about topics that otherwise seem rather straightforward.
So why was that a problem? Well, it did hamper my ability to socialize with people my own age, both male and female -- even at a university. I did not try to show off or otherwise make a big deal out of it.
But sometimes, maybe a lot of times, I couldn't help myself, and I'd go off on a tangent that left people baffled. I tried to be sociable; I'm not shy, but I'm sort of low-key perhaps.
My traits had certainly hampered my dating prospects. In fact, I'd never had a boyfriend of any kind. I'll have more about dating in a moment.
I partially compensated for that issue the year before by taking on a female lover, a fellow student named Lucy Kossoff. Yes, I am bisexual. Hey, I suppose that is one thing about me that makes me hip!
Lucy is a short, plump girl with dark-blonde hair. She is from Elsmere, DE, a suburb of Wilmington, and thus she lived in a dorm when the school was in session. We have certainly had some hot times together. And yes, she's bisexual too. How did we find each other? And yet . . .
It's not the 19th Century or even the 1950's, so I was not looking for a husband yet. I was merely looking for a guy who understood what I was talking about. I'd still have Lucy in my life, although perhaps I'd keep both of them in the dark about each other. Would she get jealous? I had no idea.
So it sounds so simple but it really was not. I was not expecting a soulmate -- there is no such thing -- merely someone I liked being around. That is probably the closest thing to true love that we can get in this world.
You may have heard how picky college girls have become recently, and there is a lot of truth in that. Also, hook-up culture is very real and although it's not universally practiced, it's quite pervasive and hard to avoid at schools.
For both males and females on campus, college is "party time," which means, among things, getting laid -- a lot. That can result in some contradictions for the girls, who want to walk a line between being cool and not appearing too loose.
Some of them handled it by thinking that acts like oral sex, one-night stands, and even friends-with-benefits arrangements "don't count." They could fool themselves about what their true "body count" was.
It was strange to hear that term because originally it was used by the American army in Vietnam to count dead "enemies." If a few luckless civilians got caught in the crossfire, they were counted too.
That was a good example of how I could lose my audience. I might casually mention the irony of the new meaning of body count. My remark would go right over their heads or they just wouldn't care. That war was nearly sixty years ago, so it was irrelevant to them.
Anyway, I'm not a judgmental person. I like that old joke that "a slut is someone who has more sex than you do." Yet, I have heard some of my classmates admit, usually when they were drunk, what their true body counts were and the numbers could be astounding.
One girl, a sophomore like me, had a count of fifty-six. Another, a junior, had seventy-four. And since they were both sloshed when they told me about it, they claimed to be proud of their accomplishments. I was imagining all of the first one's paramours filling a city bus, and those of the second filling a car on the Washington Metro.
I didn't say it, of course, but I found their tales to be a combination of funny and really strange. I never heard the numbers from any of the men. And for some people, the party years went well beyond college.
With my body count of zero, at least with males, my dating life had mostly been a comedy of errors. It is true that almost any woman can seduce almost any man merely by offering herself to him. That may be part of our evolutionary heritage. But who would really want to experience the results of that?
I got a hint of what it might be like because I was on Tinder and then Bumble for a couple of months, and briefly on both at the same time. Thus it seems good for women because they are so outnumbered by the men. That's why some chicks find those apps so addictive.
True, I did get a huge amount of attention while on those things. Just having my female face available for viewing was enough. Tinder allows for nine photos, but I only had two: my face, and a full-body shot of me in jeans.
But my God, the inanity of the interactions on those apps was amazing. I had trouble believing that all of those guys could be that shallow and stupid, or perhaps they were mostly faking it because they felt they had to.
Once in a while, somebody would be so outrageous that I would play a little game with him. There was one, when he reached about his third reply, who suddenly said, "What kind of panties are you wearing?"
Instead of getting offended, I lied about it. I texted back, "Actually, I'm not wearing any at all."
I could practically hear the sound of him gulping through my phone. His reply: "So you're wearing a skirt?"
"Yes, that's the only way it's worthwhile." I lied about that too.
Then a terse, "Why is that?" I knew I had a live one there -- a gullible one, in other words.
I was quite cheerful when I wrote, "I can feel the breezes up around my hips."
He must have come out of his shock by that point. "How about sending me pics of all this?"
I could have answered with
LOL
but I merely wrote, "I don't think that is a good idea."
He was persistent, however. "I'll send you some of me jerking-off." I presumed he meant while he was looking at my photos. It was time to end it.
"Send them later, okay?"
"Sure," and a couple of moments later I deleted him. Maybe he went through with his plan anyway, using me for spite.