Author's note:
This is part of a long story. No part of it is intended to stand alone. I suggest starting with
Part 1
In revising the whole story, I've corrected errors, but also filled in a lot. This has inevitably made it all even longer. My apologies to anyone who read it in the original form and now finds it changed for the worse.
If you're looking mostly for explicit sex, this probably is not the story for you, so why don't you just go on to something else? There is explicit sex in some parts, but even there it's not the focus.
Also, some parts contain religious discussions which will offend some people and bore others. If you're one of those people, again, why not go on to something else?
63.
The devil is in the details.
Martha and Lynda continued to show up for church, even though it was a couple of weeks before Scott spent another weekend with them. They all agreed to extend the deal for one more month. The women told Scott that they were thinking about their discussion. A couple of weeks into this, Lynda asked him some questions about some passages in the Bible.
It seemed that she was reading the gospel of Matthew, and as they talked a lot more questions came out, from chapters she had already read, as well as from the section she was currently on. Once or twice, Martha put in comments which showed that she was reading this too, and thinking about what she read. Scott suggested that Lynda use a notebook to write down her thoughts as she read, both comments and questions. He told her that this would help her keep track, and also that at a later point she might find it useful to see how her viewpoint changed as she read more.
She was taking it fairly slowly. He told her that this was good, since it gave her opportunity to really think about what she read, but that it would also help her to quickly read ahead, to give more of a framework for what she was immediately working on.
On asking, he found that she was sharing Martha's Bible. From her questions he had already known that this was the King James version, and many of the things she asked about were just issues of understanding the language. He pointed out some advantages of that version. For example, the thee's and thou's and you's and ye's had just been confusing her, but once he explained how these related to the grammar and to how many people the speaker was talking to, a lot of her confusion just evaporated.
He pointed out that in a contemporary translation, she wouldn't know whether "you" meant one person or several, and gave her a couple of examples where this might matter. But he did also go out and buy each of them a contemporary translation, the one he happened to use himself, which was also one mostly used in his church. He warned them that there was no perfect translation. Martha found the older English much less confusing than Lynda did. Scott thought that this was partly just that she was much more widely read in general—because she'd had years more for it, and also because she really liked to read more than Lynda did—and partly because she noticed language more.
Within a short time, Lynda's questions—and before long, Martha was asking, too—caused him to suggest that the three of them do some systematic studying together, not to replace their own reading but alongside it. They agreed to set aside an evening, usually Tuesday but depending on their schedules, to go over what they were studying.
He really wanted to get them involved with a group at church who already had a study going, but decided not to even suggest this. He thought that Lynda in particular would be frustrated because the group took so much Biblical knowledge for granted, and that her much more basic questions would in turn disrupt their ongoing study. At his suggestion, they began with Paul's letter to the Romans. He did encourage them to keep reading in the gospels as well. He tried, in their study and in discussing any other questions they had, to give context, which typically led them into the Old Testament, where he tried to explain the context of those parts.
He had been a little bit afraid that as they got to the section, almost at the beginning of the letter, relating to sexual sin and specifically homosexuality, that the discussion would become awkward. He found that they both saw right away how that fit into Paul's line of reasoning, and that they had almost no trouble understanding the process Paul described. They pointed out that this was another case where they needed to understand, but that understanding left them with the challenge of whether or not they were going to believe it, and if they did how they would respond.
Besides the passages they were specifically studying, they discussed any questions either of the women wanted to raise. (And Scott also occasionally asked them what they made of some passage, just to see what they would say.) After a while, he began to see some patterns to their questions. Often, Martha had questions about the historicity of the Bible, and in particular the beginning of Genesis. And Lynda, somewhat to his surprise, often had more abstract, theological or philosophical, questions: How can we even know God exists, or that the Bible (or any other candidate) actually represents communication from God? If God is really good, why is the world in such a mess?
Scott did his best with all of these, pointing them (Martha especially) to books discussing the issues raised. He understood the questions very well, and freely told them he didn't pretend to have all the answers. But in his own life, he had found he had to face pretty much the same questions. He had been raised in a church where scripture was not really taken as God's word, and so true, and where (for example) evolution was taken for granted as an explanation of the origin of life. At the time he had begun to find his views on scripture changing, all of these questions had been very pressing ones for him. For the most part, he had found answers that he found satisfactory, and satisfying, but this had all been a process taking several years. He knew that some of what he said was helpful to the two women, but in many cases they needed to consider things a lot more, and he wasn't sure how matters would fall out for them.
He didn't have all the answers, especially to Martha's questions. He tried to be very direct in saying so, not speculating—or saying clearly that he was speculating, when he did. He would have done this with anyone, but he was very aware of his promise of total honesty in this case.