The following was intended to be a part of âAngel Lost in the Dark â Chapter 7â but when it was finished I found it didnât really work. Rather than
throw it away entirely I decided to post it as a separate story. Angel (an amateur model) is telling Tom (an amateur photographer) the story as they sit around the kitchen table drinking wine. As you can tell from this excerpt the alcohol is starting to have its effect.
-----------------------------------------------
John Dillinger was shot by FBI agents and outside the Biograph theatre in Chicago on July 22, 1934. He was rushed to the hospital but it was too late. He had already kicked the bucket. His body was subsequently taken to the Cook County Morgue where numerous photographs of the body were taken. Whispered comments from unnamed doctors and newspaper photographers began to circulate that there was something âstrangeâ about the body, but the general public had no way of knowing what the whispering was about until the photographs were published the next day. Some looked at the photos and said âNo way, Jose!â but others looked at them and gasped either from fear or from jealously or from shame. There, on the front pages of the newspaper, was a photo of John Dillingerâs body laid out on a steel table covered only by a bed sheet, and the bed sheet appeared to be sticking upwards at exactly that point on his body where his dick would be!
Had this event happened in 1990, there would never have been the controversy â we are more lax when it comes to reporting news, to reporting rumors, and most importantly, to use the banner âSHOCKING PHOTOS INSIDE!!!!!â to sell newspapers. In 1934, however, the word âdickâ couldnât be used in newspapers. Any photo of a dick, even one hidden beneath a bed sheet would be considered pornography, whether it was alive or dead at the time. Even doctors who examined the corpse werenât required to view that portion of the body. As a result of this moral difference between the eras, a huge (pardon the pun) part of history simply vanished.
Or did it?
When I was in college I took a course in Dickology (A study of the historical and cultural importance of the human dick and its influence on the study of ethics, morality, and the motion picture industry) and I was amazed at how far our society has changed. The Professor who taught the course was Dick Johnson, MD (which stood for Master of Dickology) and in one of his lectures he mentioned that it was well known that John Dillinger had the largest dick ever recorded. When I questioned him about it after class he informed me that after Dillingerâs death his dick had been cut off, pickled in formaldehyde, and sent to The Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C. for study. There, he said, they not only studied it, but they weighed it, measured it, experimented with it, tested it and played games with it. After every study had been studied, every weight and been weighed, every measurement been measured, every experiment had been experimented, every test had been tested, and every conceivable game had been played (including a famous hide-and-go-seek game where they hid it so well that they almost lost it), they placed it in a small alcove in the Museum and Natural History and put it on display so the general public could Oooohhh! and Ahhhhh! over it.
I immediately asked him if it was still there, and when he told me it was I got really excited. Being a somewhat feisty college girl Iâd already seen some pretty big ones but how would they compare with Dillingerâs? I promised myself then and there that during the summer I would take a pilgrimage to the nationâs capital and see with my own eyes just how big it really was. I suppose I could have gone during the upcoming Spring Break, which was only three weeks away, but who wants to go to Washington DC when they could go to Palm Springs or to Miami Beach? By going to either one of them I might luck out and find another âbigâ one to add to my collection of comparisons.
In May I started making my plans. The first thing I did was to send for some brochures that were printed by the Smithsonian. When they arrived in the mail I immediately tore into them. Strange, I thought when I read through the first one and saw no reference to the display. Certainly a relic as important as Dillingerâs dick would be one of their major attractions, but none of the other brochures mentioned it either. The next day I called the Smithsonian and talked to the Assistant Secretary of the Assistant Curator of the Second Floor of the Museum of Natural History. After introducing myself as a serious student who was writing a paper on Dillingerâs dick for my Dickology class I told her I was taking a trip in early July and wanted to know where the dick was located. âYou arenât by any chance of student of Dick Johnson, are you?â she asked, and when I told her I was she laughed. âHeâs a nut. Weâve told him over and over again that itâs not here, but he wonât believe us. Save your money and donât come. Believe us, itâs not here.â
As you can well imagine I was flabbergasted. Professor Johnson had seemed so sure. Was he mistaken, or was he a nut like she said? I started looking through all the books that the University library had concerning the Smithsonian, the study of Dickology, and I even read a biography of Dillinger. . The only reference I could find was in a book entitled âDebunking Dillingerâs Dong â A Phallic Fallacyâ written Dr. Harry Thickfinger who I was a Professor of Dickology at NYU. I remembered Professor Johnson had once referred to him in class as âa quack who doesnât know his weenie from a hole in the ground.â
As I read Dr. Thickfingerâs book I came to the inescapable conclusion that the âquackâ wasnât Dr. Thickfinger, it was Professor Johnson. âProfessorâ Johnson had been expelled from college in his sophomore year school for his bizarre beliefs and he hade never gotten around to enrolling in any other. Besides Dillingerâs dick he believed in the Abominable Snowman, the Loch Ness Monster, flying saucers, and the theory that womenâs orgasms could be triggered by tickling their feet with goose feathers. He had absolutely no letters to put after his name and it remains a mystery to me why the school hired him to be a professor.