Note: To the folks that have been asking, yes, the missing entries are on purpose. These are excerpts from my blog where I try to post at least one thing a day, so sometimes they come out a bit redundant. So, to avoid repetition and such, I try to keep posting only the more significant entries, here. Thanks for asking!
*****
The only thing that we can ever directly control is ourselves. We do not control the submissive. It's a difficult lesson for us to wrap our minds around. But, in my experience, our success as a dominant is contingent on cultivating the admittedly counterintuitive attitude.
As dominants, we pride ourselves on our effect on others, on what we can make them do or feel. But to practice that craft in a sane way, we acknowledge this. If we don't, we begin to chase a certain result. We begin to calculate, 'What will make this person do this? What will make this thing happen?' And then we are lost.
Because you're following something, at that point. And you can't lead and follow at the same time; you end up chasing your tail. It becomes a cycle of you displaying the behaviors that you think the submissive will respond well to, and the whole process will become an unguided morass. You're putting her in charge when it's the last thing either of you want.
That's why it's necessary to remain detached from the result, to an extent. You provide a structure, a space for them, and allow them to react, and then continually modify and shape it. But have to remain aloof from it. It's a process of cultivation. Your will and hers must remain distinct, you might say, for them to produce the harmony of one being dominant and another being submissive.
Another reason is that that space can become quite claustrophobic if you allow too little space inside it for the submissive to express herself and to respond to your stimulus. They need to participate actively, and that means having a range of motion. So whatever you demand from them has to allow some perceptible level of variation that is hers.