First off, I wanted to say that I'm sorry to the kind readers who've been visiting me for the extended period of silence. Over the past few months I've tried getting back to it a few times, and had a few resulting false starts. It's difficult for me to pick up a thread like that, though, when I haven't been at it for a while, especially when I have a lot on my mental plate. My life is an unruly, chaotic, unpredictable thing that's been particularly twisty and turny of late. But, in a glass-half-full sort of way, hopefully quiet time will give me some fresh perspective change with which to attack this little topic of ours, again.
Second, I'd like to thank everyone who's written for their mails and comments. It's been incredibly encouraging and gratifying to know that the things I say might be of some use to people like all of you. That really is why I do this, so please, don't be shy if anyone has questions, comments, or requests. At any rate, I aim on getting back to posting regularly, and I do thank everyone for their patience.
So, with no further delay, on with the deviance!
*****
During this unintentional quiet period from my blog I was soliciting ideas from my lovely editor, Miss Charlotte, for simple sorts of topics that I could crank out relatively quickly, ideally once a day. And one of her suggestions was talking about bondage.
The funny thing is that at first I was a bit surprised by the suggestion. It struck me as an almost too simple of a subject to speak upon individually. But as I set out compiling mental notes associated with it; safety considerations, tips, ideas, things like that, I realized I hadn't really reviewed my thoughts on it for quite some time, and that there was a lot more material there than I had considered. So, what I first thought might be too simple for an individual post turned out to be more like fodder for several lengthy ones.
So, let's begin as simply as my usually overly pedantic mind will allow. Bondage is simply the mechanical restriction of another person. By that, I mean one person has some capacity and inclination that another person restricts.
Note that in this instance, I don't use the terms 'dominant' and 'submissive' but 'persons'. As I've said elsewhere, while there's considerable overlap among many people's interest, it's not as ubiquitous as some might think. Many people who are into bondage and S&M don't necessarily go in for all the other aspects of D/s and power exchange, and it's generally not safe to assume otherwise without asking.
So, let's divide this idea of restricting a person's capacity, of curtailing their freedom, into two categories. The first, we'll call 'physical bondage', and it's exactly what most people think of when they hear the term. That is, they're physical devices that restrict a person. Handcuffs restrict a person's capacity to use their hands and arms, a gag restricts their capacity to speak, a blindfold restricts their capacity to see, and some of the more elaborate and devious bondage furniture restricts their capacity to do very much at all.
The second category is one of those phrases that is somewhat misleading, and so of course the common use of it has been misled. When most people hear the term 'consensual bondage', they assume it means physical bondage, above, but in an instance where the subject is simply willingly bound. While that is a common sense interpretation, it's not what the term was originally coined to mean. After all, by that definition, almost all healthy bondage would simply be consensual bondage, and therefore it wouldn't be much of a distinction, would it?
Rather, consensual is willful restriction as a matter of self discipline on the part of the subject. You might think of it as a negative form of obedience training. Instead of 'do this', it's 'don't do this'. This form, unlike physical bondage, is squarely within the domain of D/s and is actually probably the most commonly used tool in a dominant's bag. When you see a dominant say 'don't speak', 'don't raise your eyes', 'put your hands there and don't move them', or even simply, 'don't move', that is what is meant by consensual bondage.
Looked at another way, physical bondage has the effect of imposing a dominant's will on a submissive, or robbing the submissive of theirs. Conversely, consensual bondage demands the constant giving over of that power, willingly.
All these effects are considerations that go into the utilization of various modes of bondage; what they want to restrict on the part of the subject and whether that participation should be of a passive or more active nature. But, the fact is that the direct, obvious effects of these restrictions are all only part of the picture, and some would say only a small part, at that.
Until one experiments directly with bondage, it's difficult to truly imagine the potential magnitude of the emotional effects of bondage.
Consider the example of a simple touch. It can be as innocent or erotic as you care to imagine. Now imagine the same exact touch when a person is handcuffed. And then imagine that very same touch when you place a person's hands flat, palms down on a table, and say if they move them, you'll spank them with a strap. Bondage in the context of play is like the effect of nitrous-oxide injectors in a car. It makes all the same operations much more powerful, and of course much riskier.